Author: Kobi Johnsson

  • US Response to France’s Diminishing Influence in Africa

    US Response to France’s Diminishing Influence in Africa

    Introduction

    Since its decolonization, France has held outsized influence in French-speaking (Francophone) African countries, cemented by its policy of Françafrique, which was designed to keep Francophone countries firmly within France’s sphere of influence. Through this policy, France was able to continue to protect and promote French interests in Francophone Africa.

    However, this sphere of influence has been waning, with France slowly losing its economic influence in the region, and struggling to provide the regional security benefits it once did. Recently, France removed all their soldiers from Mali and Burkina Faso, and was unable to prevent a coup in Niger, despite having troops stationed. With France now seeking a reset of relations within the region as a whole, it provides both opportunity and danger to US interests in Francophone countries, and Sub-Saharan Africa as a whole.

    Background Information

    After World War II, France, along with other European empires, began facing increasing pressure to grant independence to their colonies. France, however, did not want to lose the benefits it gained from its African colonies. As France granted its colonies independence, it also worked to set up a pré carré (translated as one’s little corner) system in their former African colonies that would keep the newly independent nations firmly within France’s influence. This was done by setting up Francophone Africa’s economy in a way that tied the countries to France by creating a regional currency and economic bloc, which allowed France to maintain access to essential resources. France also maintained a military presence in the new countries, which allowed France to intervene militarily within the states to protect France’s interests, and made it the de facto stabilizer of the region.

    This system began to fall apart in the 1990’s, when the French government supported Juvenal Habyarimana’s Rwandan regime despite concerns of increased ethnic tension, which ended up being the cause of the Rwandan genocide. This severely shook Francophone Africa’s trust in France, as the nations viewed France’s support of Rwanda as protecting French interests at the expense of African lives. This concern surrounding France’s reliability and worth as a partner was further enforced by France’s own shifting view of the partnership, as it sought to scale back its military presence on the continent. This reduced trust in governments that had relied on French help to secure their countries. Economic investment also began to shift away from the previous, French dominated, economic system, lowering confidence in France’s value as an economic ally.

    All of these developments have led to a souring of opinion of France in Francophone Africa, and has left the door open for other countries to increase their influence in the region. However, this weakening influence has also decreased the security of the countries, as France struggles to provide regional security as it previously did, and Francophone countries struggle to replace France’s role as a stabilizer in the region. In recent years, France has had to withdraw soldiers from Mali and Burkina Faso, which were stationed in those countries to help fight terrorist groups. France has also watched as regimes supportive of French interests have been overthrown by coups, most recently in Niger.

    US Response

    The US’s response to France’s diminishing influence has been mixed so far, with the US increasingly expanding its economic ties to Francophone African countries, but working with France often on regional security issues.

    On economic issues, the US has been working to increase its economic ties with Sub-Saharan Africa, including Francophone Africa, and have therefore used previously existing acts, such as the African Growth and Opportunity Act, to help boost trade and improve economic ties with Francophone African countries specifically. The US has also increased its push for a free trade zone throughout all of Africa, which would undercut France’s regional economic strength with Francophone countries, while increasing US access to resources and goods found in French-speaking African countries.

    When it comes to military and regional security issues, the US has expanded their military footprint in Africa, establishing a military base in Djibouti and creating AFRICOM, the United States Africa Command, which coordinates security efforts and crisis response on the African continent.

    However, US and French interests are more aligned when it comes to security, so the two nations have often found themselves advocating for the same outcome, especially with counterterrorism efforts in the Sahel region. This has often led both countries to push for the same outcomes, such as in response to the coup in Niger, although these efforts have had less success.

    Potential Benefits

    The potential benefits from the US increasing its influence are mostly found in the economic sphere, where it can sell themselves as a strong partner based on a strong record of trading with English-speaking African countries, which are viewed in Africa to generally be a ‘step ahead’ of their Francophone counterparts. The US has also emphasized equal partnerships with African nations, which resonates well with Francophone countries. Increased trade and economic ties with Francophone Africa are beneficial because of the increased access to markets and resources they provide, but also because they provide the US with an ability to demonstrate its value as an economic partner to the developing world, which tends to view US involvement as imperial, rather than as a partnership.

    Another benefit for increased US participation in Francophone Africa is counteracting Russia and China’s influence in the region. China, specifically, has used the ‘Belt and Road’ initiative to increase its influence throughout Africa through loans and investments in infrastructure in the developing world. This program now has 44 Sub-Saharan African countries as partners, and China continues to invest heavily in new infrastructure projects in partner countries, along with seeking to increase trade with the continent. By increasing ties to Francophone countries, the US would limit the chance that those countries would end up becoming more hostile to US interests through an increased alignment with China and Russia.

    Potential Drawbacks

    A major drawback of increasing US influence in Francophone Africa is that security concerns tend to be similar for Western nations. This means weakening France’s sphere of influence further puts US security interests at risk, especially considering the current state of the Sahel region. France is still a strong security partner for Francophone African countries outside of the Sahel, and weakening them further could lead to more instability throughout the entire region, especially considering that the US could struggle to step in as a security partner 

    Furthermore, this action would create an opportunity for geopolitical competitors like Russia and China to expand their security influence in Africa. These countries are already becoming more engaged in the Sahel region and across Africa. They could highlight their recent successes, like Russia’s Wagner Group aiding in stabilizing countries where France and Western nations faced challenges. This could make them more appealing to Francophone African countries as partners, shifting countries away from Western interests. This would run contrary to US goals in the region, especially considering that the US is more aligned with France in most global interests.

  • Intro to US – South African Relations

    Intro to US – South African Relations

    Introduction

    South Africa holds a prominent position in Africa as a major economic force with one of the continent’s largest economies and high human development scores. It actively participates in regional UN Peacekeeping operations and hosts the Pan-African Parliament’s permanent seat. Additionally, South Africa wields considerable soft power, using its distinctive national history and narrative to influence global affairs through soft power. As a result, United States – South African relations have an outsized importance on US relations and interests with all of Sub-Saharan Africa, as South Africa’s regional influence helps dictate US ability to achieve its goals in the region.

    Quick Facts

    History

    The connection between the US and South Africa traces back to 1799, during South Africa’s colonial period under the British Empire. In that year, the United States opened a Consulate in Cape Town, marking the initial diplomatic presence within the future borders of South Africa. Formal diplomatic ties were officially established in 1929 when South Africa gained autonomy within the British Empire.

    Once South Africa achieved independence, the US identified the nation as a key potential ally in the region, which led it to support the new South African government. However, this decision became more difficult to justify when the new South African government implemented the system of Apartheid—a policy of segregation and discrimination based on race, against non-white South Africans. The US later adopted a ‘Communication‘ policy towards South Africa, aiming to strike a balance between strategic and economic concerns by cultivating favorable relations with the South African government. The goal was to encourage the regime to cooperate with the US and gradually persuade them to dismantle the Apartheid system. This led the US to become one of the few countries not to embargo South Africa, helping give the regime cover at the UN.

    Concerned that its close ties to the Apartheid regime were straining relationships with other African nations, the US, during the Carter administration, started gradually reducing its diplomatic engagement with South Africa while still maintaining economic connections. However, due to the Angolan Civil War evolving into a proxy conflict between Marxist and anti-communist forces, the US sought military assistance from South Africa, which created conflicting messages about its stance on South Africa. However, public pressure continued to build to cut ties with the Apartheid regime, so when the Angolan Civil War died down, so did US support for South Africa, as there were no pressing security issues in the region, and therefore no strong justifications to support the regime. With the loss of its last major international partner, the South African regime, now led by F.W. deKlerk, pivoted towards working with Nelson Mandela and the African National Congress to bring an end to Apartheid.

    Once the Apartheid regime fell, and the ANC was elected in the free and fair election of 1994, the US and South Africa developed closer relations. This was sparked by the personal friendship between US President Bill Clinton and Mandela. However, Mandela’s successor, Thabo Mbeki, and many members of the ruling ANC in South Africa, did not fully trust the US because of the prolonged period of cooperation with the apartheid government, which led to reduced cooperation between the two countries.

    Relations between the two countries continued to swing with each new administration on either side, despite the strong economic ties. This has led South Africa to court geopolitical rivals of the United States, including Russia and China. In 2023, tensions escalated between the two countries when the US ambassador accused South Africa of supplying arms to Russia for the conflict in Ukraine, despite South Africa’s official stance of neutrality.

    Strategic Interests

    • Economic/Trade: Trade between the US and South Africa is strong, and South Africa is the largest African trading partner for the US. South Africa’s mineral wealth, including Platinum and Gold, is sought after by American industries. In return, South Africa’s primary import from the US is automobiles. However, South Africa is part of BRICS, an economic alliance with Brazil, Russia, India, China, and South Africa, aimed at boosting their economies collectively. This expansion could potentially divert South Africa’s economic interests away from the US.
    • Military/Regional Security: The US and South Africa are major partners for promoting regional stability in the Southern Africa region. As a result, the US and South Africa cooperate on military and regional security issues, and the two countries conduct joint military exercises. The US military is involved in health initiatives by providing logistical planning. However, South Africa has also led joint exercises with Russia and China, highlighting how South Africa continues to refuse to align too closely with either the US or its geopolitical rivals.
    • Global Health: The US and South Africa have a longstanding partnership working towards promoting global and regional health. The US has invested billions to PEPFAR, a program which helps prevent and treat HIV/AIDS. PEPFAR has invested heavily in South Africa, and the surrounding region, which had some of the highest rates of infection. This partnership expanded to cover other threatening diseases, such as Covid-19. This growth has ensured that the partnership remains a robust point of cooperation between the two countries.

    Future Developments

    The US will face competition from Russia and China in vying for influence in South Africa. South Africa is expected to use its differing relationships to maximize its own benefits, while carefully managing ties with the global powers to avoid upsetting any one of them. To maintain South Africa as a regional partner, the US must further develop and utilize economic and health connections. Building trust is crucial, given the historical context that still influences the relationship.

  • Kobi Johnsson, University of Chicago

    Kobi Johnsson, University of Chicago

    Kobi Johnsson is an undergraduate student at the University of Chicago, majoring in Anthropology and Global Studies.  He is a University and Merriam Scholar, and is a member of the Public Policy Leaders Program, where he learns and utilizes important skills for the public policy sphere.  His passion lies in understanding the history and culture of different societies, and using that knowledge to help improve cooperation and collaboration between countries, so that they can work together to collectively mprove the lives of their citizens.  Kobi is a graduate of the African Leadership Academy’s Global Scholars Program, and had done work with City Year and the Boys and Girls Club, focusing on youth engagement and education.  He hopes to work on promoting global youth education and engagement after graduating.  In his free time, he enjoys swimming and playing water polo, reading mysteries, solving logic puzzles, debating (sometimes) and playing laser tag with friends.

    LinkedIn