ACE

Author: Chris Maichin

  • Robert F. Kennedy Jr. Confirmed as HHS Secretary: Can He “Make America Healthy Again”?

    Robert F. Kennedy Jr. Confirmed as HHS Secretary: Can He “Make America Healthy Again”?

    As President Trump continues his push to reshape the federal government, one of his most controversial cabinet nominations has now been confirmed. Robert F. Kennedy Jr., once a Democratic challenger to Joe Biden, then an independent presidential candidate, and now a Trump ally, was officially sworn in as the 26th Secretary of the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) on February 13th, 2025. 

    What is HHS?

    The Department of Health and Human Services is a cabinet-level Department that falls under the Executive Branch of the U.S. government. It was created with the mission to “improve the health, safety, and wellbeing of America”. While Congress creates federal health policies, they are predominantly implemented through HHS. As Secretary, Kennedy will oversee all HHS programs, including the National Institutes of Health (NIH), Center for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), Food and Drug Administration (FDA), and Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS), managing nearly $2 trillion in funding dedicated to public health research and programming. 

    The Road to Confirmation

    The road to Kennedy’s confirmation as HHS Secretary was anything but conventional. Kennedy initially entered the 2024 race as a Democrat, appealing to the left on environmental issues while simultaneously drawing support from several longtime Republican donors for his stance on the weaponization of federal government and opposition to vaccines. When Kennedy’s Democratic bid for the presidency fell short, he pivoted to an independent run, seeking to carve out a path outside the two-party system. But as the race tightened and third-party candidates became a potential deciding factor, Kennedy endorsed Donald Trump. Now, in a turn few could have predicted just a year ago, he is at the helm of America’s largest public health agency. 

    Kennedy’s appointment has been met with fierce debate, given his longtime anti-vaccine advocacy. He is the Founder and Former Chairman of Children’s Health Defense (CHD), an organization that has been known to finance and produce misinformation campaigns on vaccines and the COVID-19 pandemic. During his tenure as Chairman, Kennedy has served as a lawyer in several of CHD’s lawsuits against vaccine mandates and public health institutions, including federal agencies he now oversees as HHS Secretary. In December 2021, Kennedy called the COVID-19 vaccine “the deadliest vaccine ever made”. Despite this, Kennedy has repeatedly stated that he is not anti-vaccine. His views, however, have made him a target for critics who accuse him of fueling vaccine hesitancy.

    During his confirmation hearings, Kennedy attempted to clarify his stance on vaccinations, emphasizing that he supports vaccines but believes in stronger oversight and transparency in pharmaceutical research and regulatory processes. He also faced scrutiny over his position on Medicare and Medicaid. Lawmakers on both sides of the aisle pressed him on whether he would support expansion or re-structuring for these programs, particularly in light of rising healthcare costs. Kennedy stated that he “doesn’t have a plan to dismantle the program”, but made claims about the ineffectiveness of both Medicare and Medicaid. 

    His confirmation vote was nearly along party lines, with only one Republican breaking ranks—Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell, a polio survivor who has been a staunch advocate for vaccination. Leader McConnell stated, “I will not condone the re-litigation of proven cures, and neither will millions of Americans who credit their survival and quality of life to scientific miracles.” 

    Beyond vaccines, Kennedy’s confirmation hearing touched on other major health crises, including the opioid epidemic, rising healthcare costs, and chronic disease prevention. His critics argue that his unconventional views on medicine could make it harder to implement evidence-based policy, while his supporters see him as a disruptor willing to challenge entrenched interests and focus on pressing issues like processed foods and big pharma. 

    The “Make America Healthy Again” Commission

    Kennedy’s confirmation coincided with President Trump’s signing of an executive order establishing the “Make America Healthy Again Commission.” This initiative aims to investigate the root causes of America’s chronic health crisis, with a particular focus on childhood diseases. In his remarks, Kennedy expressed gratitude for the opportunity, stating, “I have prayed each morning for the past two decades for God to put me in a position to solve the childhood chronic disease epidemic, and now, thanks to you Mr. President, we will make this promise a reality.” 

    With trust in public health agencies facing a decline along partisan lines, the coming months will reveal whether Secretary Kennedy’s policy priorities succeed in “making America healthy again”. 

  • Trump’s Tariffs: Key Updates and Ongoing Debate

    Trump’s Tariffs: Key Updates and Ongoing Debate

    One of President Trump’s myriad “first-day” promises, the plan to leverage tariffs against Canada, Mexico, and China drew attention on the campaign trail. Two weeks into his second term, the campaign promise came to fruition via three consecutive executive orders, sparking economic debate and what some are calling a trade war with neighboring countries. 

    The Executive Orders

    On February first, the White House released an emergency memo announcing new tariffs as a means to combat “the extraordinary threat posed by illegal aliens and drugs”. The declaration alluded to executive orders from the same day which invoked the International Emergency Economic Powers Act (IEEPA) to impose tariffs on Canada, Mexico, and China. Collectively, these orders levied 25% tariffs on all goods from Canada and Mexico and a 10% tariff on all goods from China. The first order carves out a smaller 10% tariff on energy resources imported from Canada to limit domestic energy shortages.

    Diplomatic Standoff and Temporary Delay

    Just before the tariffs were set to take effect, Mexican President Claudia Sheinbaum and Canadian Prime Minister Justin Trudeau negotiated a 30-day delay, agreeing to several conditions. The 30-day window sets a tight deadline for implementing the following measures, with the potential for future U.S. tariffs lingering in the case of failed implementation:

    Canada:

    • Appointing a Fentanyl Czar: Canada will designate a high-level official responsible for coordinating efforts to combat fentanyl production and distribution.
    • Designation of Drug Cartels as Terrorist Organizations: This move aims to enhance legal frameworks for tackling organized crime.
    • Intelligence Sharing and Funding: Canada will implement an intelligence directive targeting fentanyl and organized crime, supported by substantial funding.
    • Border Security Enhancements: Canada has pledged to bolster its border security measures to prevent illegal crossings and drug smuggling.

    Mexico:

    • Deployment of National Guard: Mexico will send 10,000 National Guard troops to its northern border to prevent drug trafficking and illegal immigration.
    • Cooperation on Weapons Trafficking: Mexico will work jointly with the U.S. to curb the trafficking of weapons into Mexico.

    China did not negotiate a delay, and instead retaliated immediately with its own tariffs on American energy and agricultural imports. China also filed an official dispute in the World Trade Organization.

    During negotiations for the 30-day-delay, Canada also retaliated with its own tariffs on U.S. goods. On February 4th, Prime Minister Trudeau implemented a CA$155 billion tariff package that will impact myriad products including steel and plastic, household appliances, and coffee. Mexico has not yet proposed retaliatory tariffs. 

    Prospective Impacts

    The Trump administration’s use of tariffs is not new; in his first term, President Trump levied considerable tariffs on steel and aluminum imports, impacting China, India, the European Union, and other trade partners. However, President Trump’s recent executive orders have drawn increased attention for their novel scope. This is the first time in American history that a sitting President has invoked IEEPA to leverage tariffs, bypassing the formal investigation process required under other tariff-related laws like Section 232. Supporters emphasize that the use of IEEPA allows President Trump to act more efficiently in light of the pressing opioid crisis, while critics warn that using IEEPA to implement tariffs risks unchecked executive authority. 

    Economically, some experts warn that this round of tariffs could raise consumer prices significantly more than the tariffs from the last Trump administration due to their expanded scope, targeting of consumer goods, and ongoing inflation. A report from the Tax Foundation estimates that tariffs will function as a hidden tax, potentially costing households hundreds of dollars annually. Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer called the tariffs “the beginning of a golden age of higher costs for American families”, warning that they would strain relations with allies and worsen supply chain issues. On the other hand, some argue that Trump’s tariff strategy has already succeeded in forcing Canada and Mexico to the negotiating table, leading to unprecedented commitments to address border security and the drug trade. They emphasize that the proposed tariffs were a strategic move to force cooperation from neighboring countries on pressing issues, despite the short-term economic cost. 

    Will the Tariffs Actually Be Imposed?

    While the 30-day delay provides an opportunity for Canada and Mexico to fulfill their commitments, President Trump has stated that he fully intends to impose tariffs if they fail to act decisively. Moreover, on February 13th, President Trump signed a memo calling for research on retaliatory tariffs, signaling that the White House is preparing to impose additional tariffs on nations like Canada and China that initially retaliated with tariffs of their own.

  • A Guide to the DNC: Day 4

    A Guide to the DNC: Day 4

    The fourth and final night of the Democratic National Convention featured the theme “For the Future,” encapsulating the forward-looking message that has defined the event. While the night included appearances by high-profile celebrities, Democratic officials, and party elites, the spotlight was firmly on Kamala Harris as she officially accepted the Democratic nomination for President of the United States.

    As calls for freedom and the promise of a new future echoed through the United Center in Chicago, here’s what the Democrats had to say as they closed out their convention and introduced their new leader.

    Key Speakers of Night 4:

    Elizabeth Warren

    Elizabeth Warren emphasized Kamala Harris’s commitment to making life more affordable for working families. She highlighted Harris’s efforts to tackle price gouging during crises like the California wildfires and the pandemic. Warren portrayed Harris as a determined advocate for women’s rights, stating, “Kamala will protect abortion rights nationwide,” and concluded with a vote of confidence: “Kamala Harris is someone we can trust.”

    Members of the Central Park 5

    The Central Park 5 spoke about their wrongful convictions and subsequent exoneration, using their story to underscore the importance of justice and voting. They expressed their belief that Kamala Harris would continue to fight for fairness in America, with one member stating, “Vice President Kamala Harris has also worked to make things fairer. I know she will do the same as President.”

    Former Arizona Rep. Gabby Giffords

    Gabby Giffords, a survivor of gun violence, expressed admiration for Kamala Harris’s resilience and dedication. Giffords praised Harris’s ability to challenge the gun lobby and protect abortion access, portraying her as a leader with the strength to enact meaningful change: “Kamala can beat the gun lobby. She can fight gun trafficking.”

    Arizona Sen. Mark Kelly

    Mark Kelly focused on Kamala Harris’s dedication to national security and support for the military. He emphasized the importance of America’s alliances and the challenges a second Trump presidency might bring. Kelly commended Harris’s understanding of foreign policy, noting, “Kamala Harris knows that standing with our allies means standing up for Americans.”

    Michigan Governor Gretchen Whitmer

    Governor Gretchen Whitmer highlighted Kamala Harris as a leader who understands the struggles of ordinary Americans, particularly working women. Whitmer drew parallels between their shared experiences of caring for ill mothers, and emphasized Harris’s commitment to healthcare and elder care, stating, “Kamala Harris knows who she’s fighting for too.”

    Maya Harris, Kamala’s Sister

    Maya Harris provided a personal glimpse into Kamala Harris’s upbringing, sharing stories about their mother’s influence. She described their mother, Shyamala Gopalan Harris, as a trailblazer who instilled in them a belief in their potential and a responsibility to fight for justice. Maya highlighted Kamala’s lifelong dedication to these values, saying, “Kamala’s entire life has been about fighting for each of us to have that freedom.”

    North Carolina Governor Roy Cooper

    Governor Roy Cooper spoke about Kamala Harris’s determination to stand up for everyday Americans against powerful interests. He recounted how Harris, as California’s Attorney General, secured $20 billion for California families during the foreclosure crisis. Cooper praised Harris as a leader who “does exactly what she said she’s going to do,” urging Americans to support her as she would fight for them.

    Kamala Harris

    Kamala Harris’s speech was the crowning moment of the convention, blending her personal story with a strong policy vision. She began by acknowledging her roots, particularly the influence of her mother, Shyamala Gopalan Harris, and her immigrant upbringing. Harris spoke at length about the values instilled in her by her family, such as community, faith, and the importance of justice. She linked these values to her professional journey, highlighting her work as a prosecutor and attorney general, where she fought against sexual abuse, big banks, and elder abuse, emphasizing that “a harm against any one of us is a harm against all of us.”

    Harris laid out her vision for the economy, promising to build a strong middle class through an “opportunity economy” that would create jobs, lower the cost of living, and provide access to capital for small businesses. She sharply contrasted her vision with Donald Trump’s, accusing him of serving only himself and his billionaire friends, while she pledged a “middle-class tax cut.”

    Harris underscored her administration’s commitment to supporting Ukraine in the face of Russian aggression. She recalled her direct engagement with Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky, warning him of Russia’s impending invasion: “Five days before Russia attacked Ukraine, I met with President Zelensky to warn him about Russia’s plan to invade.” She highlighted how the Biden administration successfully rallied over 50 countries to defend Ukraine, declaring, “I helped mobilize a global response… to defend against Putin’s aggression.” This, she argued, is essential to upholding democratic values and international law.

    On the Israel-Gaza war, Harris expressed unwavering support for Israel’s right to self-defense while acknowledging the humanitarian crisis in Gaza. “I will always stand up for Israel’s right to defend itself,” she stated, while also describing the devastation in Gaza as “heartbreaking.” Harris emphasized the administration’s diplomatic efforts to achieve a ceasefire and secure a hostage deal, noting, “President Biden and I are working around the clock because now is the time to get a hostage deal and a ceasefire deal done.”

    Outlining her broader Middle East strategy, she focused on countering Iranian-backed terrorism and strengthening U.S. alliances. She criticized Trump for being easily manipulated by autocrats like Kim Jong Un, warning, “They know Trump won’t hold autocrats accountable because he wants to be an autocrat himself.” Harris pledged to maintain U.S. leadership in critical areas like space and artificial intelligence, vowing, “I will make sure to lead the world into the future on space and artificial intelligence that America, not China, wins the competition for the 21st century.”

    She reaffirmed her vision of America as a global leader that champions democracy, human rights, and strong alliances. She contrasted this with Trump’s isolationism, urging, “In the enduring struggle between democracy and tyranny, I know where I stand and I know where the United States belongs.” Harris called on Americans to support her leadership to secure the nation’s future and uphold the values that define American democracy.

    Harris also spoke on women’s reproductive rights, positioning it as a fundamental freedom that is under unprecedented attack. She directly linked the current state of reproductive rights in America to Donald Trump’s influence, stating, “Donald Trump handpicked members of the United States Supreme Court to take away reproductive freedom. And now he brags about it.”

    Harris recounted stories from women across the country who have suffered due to the erosion of reproductive rights, highlighting the human cost of these political decisions. “Women have told me those stories… of miscarrying in a parking lot, developing sepsis, losing the ability to ever again have children,” she said, painting a vivid picture of the stakes involved.

    Harris also warned of Trump’s broader agenda: “As part of his agenda, he and his allies will limit access to birth control, ban medication abortion, and enact a nationwide abortion ban with or without Congress.” In contrast, Harris pledged to restore these rights, asserting, “When Congress passes a bill to restore reproductive freedom, as president of the United States, I will proudly sign it into law.”

    Vice President Harris concluded her speech with a call to action, urging Americans to embrace a future defined by freedom, opportunity, and unity. She contrasted this vision with the divisive rhetoric of her opponents, stating, “In the enduring struggle between democracy and tyranny, I know where I stand and I know where the United States belongs.”

    “Let us show each other and the world who we are and what we stand for: freedom, opportunity, compassion, dignity, fairness, and endless possibilities.” Harris called on Americans to rise to the occasion, saying, “It is now our turn to do what generations before us have done… to fight for the ideals we cherish and to uphold the awesome responsibility that comes with the greatest privilege on earth, the privilege and pride of being an American.”

    With this rallying cry, Harris sought to unite the nation around a vision of progress and inclusivity, urging all to vote and contribute to writing “the next great chapter in the most extraordinary story ever told.”

    The stage is now set. The candidates are locked in, and there is no going back.

    Coming off a historic convention, Kamala Harris seems to have all the momentum heading into November. But now, she faces the real test.

    In just under three weeks, Harris will face Trump on the debate stage. For the first time, Americans will have the chance to see the contrast between Donald Trump and Kamala Harris, compare their visions for the country, and decide who they want to lead them into the future.

    Get ready, America, because we’re in for a ride.

    Stay here to get all your news without the spin. Stay engaged, stay informed, stay critical.

    Questions to ask yourself after reading

    Do I agree with Vice President Kamala Harris’ vision for the country?

    Do I agree with her policy in regards to the economy, foreign policy, abortion, etc?

    Do I know enough about VP Harris’ policies?

  • Journey to the White House: Kamala Harris’s 2020 Campaign Unpacked

    Journey to the White House: Kamala Harris’s 2020 Campaign Unpacked

    As Vice President Kamala Harris ascends to the spotlight amid President Joe Biden’s decision not to run for reelection, she is beginning to separate herself from the Biden Administration, making the pitch of a new face with similar policies.

    However, Kamala Harris did not always agree with President Biden, especially when they went head to head in the 2020 Democratic primary. As voters attempt to understand a new candidate in such a short window of time, it is important to take a look at Vice President Harris’s 2020 presidential campaign and the vision she had for America before joining Biden on the ticket.

    Harris, the junior U.S. Senator from California, officially began her bid for the White House on January 21, 2019, Martin Luther King Jr. Day. She made the announcement in an appearance on “Good Morning America,” with a rally in Oakland later that day which drew a crowd of over 20,000 supporters.

    Here were her views on key issues:

    Immigration

    Kamala Harris’s immigration policy during her 2020 presidential campaign was characterized by strong opposition to the Trump administration’s hardline stances and a commitment to humane and comprehensive immigration reform.

    She was a staunch advocate for reinstating DACA (Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals) protections and supported providing a path to citizenship for DREAMers, young undocumented immigrants brought to the U.S. as children.

    Harris was highly critical of the Trump administration’s policy of separating children from their parents when illegally crossing the southern border. She called for increased oversight of detention centers and opposed the detention of pregnant immigrants.

    One of Harris’s most notable stances was her support for making illegal immigration a civil offense rather than a criminal one. She claimed that it would reduce the harsh penalties associated with border crossings and shift the focus toward civil procedures and protections.

    Harris also expressed support for re-evaluating and possibly abolishing ICE (Immigration and Customs Enforcement). She criticized ICE’s practices under the Trump administration, which she viewed as excessively aggressive and inhumane. Harris proposed restructuring immigration enforcement to focus on serious criminal activity rather than indiscriminate raids and deportations.

    She called for a comprehensive immigration reform package that included a pathway to citizenship for the 11 million undocumented immigrants living in the United States. Her plan emphasized humanely securing the border, protecting asylum seekers, and expanding legal immigration channels.

    Economy/Taxes

    In 2019, Harris proposed several changes to the tax code which aimed to support low- and middle-class families while increasing taxes on the wealthy. Her plan, which she called the “LIFT Act,” included a new refundable tax credit that would provide up to $500 per month to families making less than $100,000 per year.

    Along with this, she proposed an increase in the top marginal income tax rate from 37% to 39.6%, targeting the top 1% of earners. This increase was part of her broader plan to ensure the wealthiest pay their fair share of taxes, a sentiment that was echoed constantly in the Biden Administration. 

    She proposed increasing the corporate tax rate from 21%, set by Trump’s Tax Cuts and Jobs Act, up to 35%, arguing corporations should contribute more to federal revenue to support public service and infrastructure. Her plan also included imposing a financial transaction tax on stock and bond trades, and derivative transactions.

    Healthcare

    Harris initially supported Bernie Sanders’ “Medicare for All” plan, which proposed eliminating private health insurance in favor of a government-run system. However, she later moderated her stance, proposing a plan that allowed for regulated private insurance alongside a public option​​, aiming to balance progressive goals with practical implementation.

    Harris emphasized the need to address the maternal mortality crisis, particularly among Black women, and called for increased investments in maternal healthcare services and policies to reduce these disparities​.

    She also proposed measures to reduce prescription drug costs, including allowing the federal government to negotiate drug prices directly with pharmaceutical companies and importing cheaper drugs from other countries​.

    Gun Control

    Kamala Harris’s stance on gun control during her 2020 presidential bid included several progressive measures aimed at reducing gun violence.

    She supported implementing universal background checks for all gun purchases, including private and public sales. She advocated for renewing the federal assault weapons ban, arguing these weapons are often used in mass shootings and have no place in civilian hands. Harris also supported laws that allow law enforcement to temporarily seize firearms from individuals deemed a threat to themselves or others, aiming to prevent potential tragedies.

    She also proposed stricter regulations on gun dealers, including mandatory background checks for those selling more than five guns a year and enforcing penalties for violations.

    Criminal Justice and Social Justice

    In the wake of the killing of George Floyd and the Black Lives Matter movement, racial inequality and injustice became hotbed topics of the 2020 Democratic primary. The Black prosecutor from California used this issue to her advantage.

    Harris pledged to end mass incarceration by eliminating private prisons, abolishing mandatory minimum sentences, and promoting alternatives to incarceration for low-level offenders, which she claimed disproportionately target Black and brown Americans.

    Following the killing of George Floyd, Harris supported a comprehensive package of police reforms, including banning chokeholds, requiring body cameras, and establishing a national standard for the use of force. She also advocated for increased accountability measures for police misconduct. She focused on addressing racial disparities in the criminal justice system, proposed measures to combat racial profiling, expanded anti-bias training for law enforcement, and supported community-based public safety programs.

    She also aimed to address economic inequalities exacerbated by the criminal justice system. She proposed a plan to provide financial support to individuals returning from incarceration to help them reintegrate into society and reduce recidivism.

    Environment

    Harris supported the Green New Deal and called for aggressive action to combat climate change. Her plan included transitioning to 100% clean electricity by 2030 and achieving net-zero carbon emissions by 2045. She also advocated for rejoining the Paris Agreement.

    She proposed a nationwide ban on fracking, citing the environmental and public health risks associated with hydraulic fracturing, and emphasized the need to address environmental racism, arguing that low-income and minority communities are disproportionately affected by environmental hazards.

    Harris called for substantial investments in green energy infrastructure and technology. Her plan included federal funding for renewable energy projects, incentives for electric vehicle adoption, and the development of sustainable public transportation systems.

    ____________________________________________________________________________

    Harris’s campaign faced significant challenges and, citing a lack of funds, she suspended her campaign on December 3, 2019, before the Iowa caucuses. She immediately endorsed Joe Biden and was selected to be his running mate on August 11, 2020.

    As Vice President, Harris has had to align her previous campaign positions with the broader goals of the Biden administration, sometimes leading to perceived backtracking on issues like healthcare and criminal justice. She is the first major party nominee in history to never win a single presidential primary election.

    As she prepares for her 2024 presidential run, it remains to be seen whether she will revert to her previous progressive stances or aim for a more centrist approach to appeal to a broader electorate. Her selection of Minnesota Governor Tim Walz as her running mate suggests she is trying to energize the Democratic base rather than pivot to the center. This choice indicates a strategic decision to rally core supporters while also leveraging Walz’s appeal in the Midwest, neutralizing JD Vance’s rustbelt appeal.

    Harris’s 2024 campaign will have to find a way to balance her past progressive proposals with a pragmatic approach to executive governance. Voters will watch closely to see if she maintains her strong positions on healthcare, immigration, and criminal justice reform or adjusts her policies to attract a wider range of voters. The challenge for Harris will be to unify the Democratic Party while presenting a clear and compelling vision for the future of all Americans.

    With just over two months until the election, it is crunch time for both Democrats and Republicans. As Republicans have struggled to shift their focus from Biden to Harris, Democrats have seen a surge in momentum in polling and fundraising. The key questions now are whether this momentum will last for Harris and the Democrats and if the Trump campaign can find a messaging strategy against her that resonates with the American people.

    Although there is little time left on the calendar, a lot can happen in two months. Just look at how much the political landscape has changed since July. As the debates between Trump and Harris approach in September, Americans will finally get to see their choices and make a decision.

    Be prepared for potential September, October, and maybe even November surprises. A lot can happen in a short amount of time, and pundits will be quick to put their spin on events before you have a chance to think for yourself. Stick with us for all the information without the spin. Stay engaged, stay informed, stay critical.

    Questions to ask yourself after reading?

    • Has my view of Vice President Harris changed now that I know what she ran on in 2020?
    • Do I support her 2020 policy positions on healthcare, immigration, the economy, criminal justice, gun control, and the environment?
    • Do I think Governor Tim Walz was a good choice as her running mate?
    • Am I more or less likely to support her 2024 presidential bid based on her past and present policies?
    • Do I believe Harris will return to her progressive stances or move towards the center to appeal to a broader electorate?
    • How important are the issues of healthcare, immigration, and criminal justice to me in evaluating Harris’s candidacy?
    • Do I feel confident in Harris’s ability to unify the Democratic Party and present a compelling vision for the future?
    • Do I feel confident in Harris’s ability to unify the entire nation and present a compelling vision for the future?
  • Christopher Maichin, Colby College

    Christopher Maichin, Colby College

    My name is Christopher Maichin. I am a sophomore at Colby College studying Government and Education. I am also a member of the Varsity Men’s Lacrosse Team.

  • Biden Ends Re-election Campaign: Democratic Race Reopens

    Biden Ends Re-election Campaign: Democratic Race Reopens

    After weeks of calls to step down following his presidential debate performance in June, President Joe Biden has decided not to run for re-election in 2024.

    In this not-so-unexpected turn of events, the American people are in for an interesting and unprecedented August as the Democrats decide who will be their nominee to face off against former President Donald Trump.

    On Sunday afternoon, in his letter to the American people informing them of his decision to step down, the President began by addressing the accomplishments of his administration.

    He wrote, “Today, America has the strongest economy in the world. We’ve made historic investments in rebuilding our Nation, in lowering prescription drug costs for seniors, and in expanding affordable health care to a record number of Americans. We’ve provided critically needed care to a million veterans exposed to toxic substances, passed the first gun safety law in 30 years, appointed the first African American woman to the Supreme Court, and passed the most significant climate legislation in the history of the world. America has never been better positioned to lead than we are today.”

    He continued, “It has been the greatest honor of my life to serve as your President. And while it has been my intention to seek re-election, I believe it is in the best interest of my party and the country for me to step down and to focus solely on fulfilling my duties as President for the remainder of my term.”

    In a statement later, Biden endorsed Vice President Kamala Harris to be the Democratic presidential nominee. He wrote, “My fellow Democrats, I have decided not to accept the nomination and to focus all my energies on my duties as President for the remainder of my term. My very first decision as the party nominee in 2020 was to pick Kamala Harris as my Vice President. And it’s been the best decision I’ve made. Today I want to offer my full support and endorsement for Kamala to be the nominee of our party this year. Democrats — it’s time to come together and beat Trump. Let’s do this.”

    However, even though President Biden endorsed Harris, it does not mean she will be the Democratic nominee.

    So, what happens now?

    Now that President Biden has decided not to run for re-election, the delegates who were bound to their electoral outcome with Biden as the winner are now released, allowing them to vote for and nominate whomever they choose at the convention.

    This means that all 3,896 delegates President Biden received from winning each state primary will no longer have allegiance to him, making room for an open convention.

    The same rules still apply at the Democratic National Convention.

    There are an estimated 4,672 delegates up for grabs in 2024. Of these, 3,933 are pledged delegates and 739 are superdelegates. 

    Whichever candidate reaches the 1,968 pledged delegate threshold, clinches the nomination. 

    The DNC rules also state that the Vice President is nominated first, adding an interesting twist to an already unprecedented convention. 

    Pundits immediately began to speculate as to who the next nominee might be. After his statement, Bill and Hillary Clinton released a statement endorsing Harris to be the next president, as did California Governor Gavin Newsom.

    Former President Barack Obama also released a statement; however, he did not endorse Kamala Harris to be the nominee. He emphasized his confidence in the leaders of the party to “create a process from which an outstanding nominee emerges.”

    The “Biden-Harris” Campaign has officially become the “Harris Campaign,” with all funds being diverted to Harris, making her the most equipped candidate with a formidable campaign apparatus to run for president in just over two months.

    Republican Reactions 

    Former President Trump immediately responded to Biden’s decision to step down. In a post on TruthSocial, he wrote, “Crooked Joe Biden was not fit to run for President, and is certainly not fit to serve – And never was!… We will suffer greatly because of his presidency, but we will remedy the damage he has done very quickly. MAKE AMERICA GREAT AGAIN!”

    He then turned the attack to his possible next opponent, writing “Kamala Harris is just as much of a joke as Biden is…. Harris has been the Enabler-in-Chief for Crooked Joe this entire time. They own each other’s records, and there is no distance between the two. Harris must defend the failed Biden Administration AND her liberal, weak-on-crime record in CA…And during this entire term, Kamala Harris – as well as every other Democrat in Washington, sat by and did NOTHING. They are all just as complicit as Biden is in the destruction of our once-great Nation, and they must all be thrown out of office.”

    In the wake of the announcement, some Republican lawmakers have come out criticizing Biden for stepping down after the primary process, calling his move “undemocratic.”

    Speaker of the House Mike Johnson issued a statement writing, “At this unprecedented juncture in American history, we must be clear about what just happened. The Democrat Party forced the Democrat nominee off the ballot, just over 100 days before the election.”

    He also called for Biden to immediately resign, saying, “If Joe Biden is not fit to run for President, he is not fit to serve as President. He must resign the office immediately. November 5 cannot arrive soon enough.”

    Between the attempted assassination attempt on former President Trump and President Biden deciding not to run for re-election, it looks like October surprises came early this year. The American people are in for an interesting end of their summer, as the 2024 political landscape drastically changes before their very eyes.

    President Trump will now have to focus his efforts on a new opponent, and Kamala Harris will have to shore up support among her fellow Democrats to lead the fight against him. The Democratic National Convention starts August 19, leaving just about three weeks for potential nominees to start wooing delegates in their favor.

    It is going to be an exciting August. Stay here for constant updates without the spin. Stay engaged, stay critical, stay informed.

    Questions to ask yourself after reading:

    Do I agree with President Biden’s decision to not seek re-election?

    Should Kamala Harris be the Democratic nominee? If not, who?

    Should there be a debate between now and the Democratic National Convention for possible candidates?

    Who matches up best with former President Trump?

  • A Guide to the Republican National Convention: Day 2

    A Guide to the Republican National Convention: Day 2

    On the second night of the Republican National Convention, the theme “Make America Safe Again” resonated throughout the evening, but the underlying message of unity was unmistakable. The night saw a series of powerful speeches from key Republican figures, all rallying behind former President Donald Trump. They addressed various issues from economic policies to national security, emphasizing the need for a cohesive Republican front to ensure a return to the White House.

    Ted Cruz: The Border Crisis

    Senator Ted Cruz delivered a poignant address focusing on the border crisis. He painted a vivid picture of the human cost associated with illegal immigration, citing numerous tragic examples of Americans who had suffered due to crimes committed by illegal immigrants. Cruz emphasized the magnitude of the crisis by comparing the influx of illegal immigrants to filling 639 arenas, each holding about 18,000 people.

    Cruz passionately stated, “Every day Americans are dying… This is evil and it’s wrong. And it is happening every damn day.” He blamed the Biden administration’s policies for this crisis and asserted that under Trump, the border was secure. Cruz called for a return to strict border enforcement to protect American lives and restore safety.

    Rep. Steve Scalise (R-LA): Critiquing the Biden Administration

    Rep. Steve Scalise (LA-1) offered a sharp critique of the Biden administration’s handling of the economy and energy policies. Scalise highlighted the stark differences between the current administration and Trump’s tenure, focusing on job losses and energy dependence.

    He pointed out that while President Biden approved the Nord Stream pipeline for Russia, he canceled the Keystone pipeline in the U.S., leading to thousands of lost American jobs. Scalise also criticized Biden for allowing Iran and Venezuela to export oil while hindering American natural gas exports. He stressed, “President Biden waived taxes on Chinese solar panels, but he raised taxes on Americans.”

    Scalise underscored the need to re-elect Donald Trump to restore American energy dominance and make the Trump tax cuts permanent. He also touched on border security, promising that a Republican majority would pass H.R.2 to secure the border and finish building the wall.

    Speaker of the House Mike Johnson (R-LA): Law and Order

    House Speaker Mike Johnson emphasized the Republican Party’s commitment to law and order. He announced an immediate investigation into the assassination attempt on Donald Trump, portraying the Republicans as staunch defenders of American values and the rule of law.

    Johnson stated, “We in the Republican Party are the law and order team. We always have been and we always will be the advocates for the rule of law.” He stressed the importance of a united Republican Party to safeguard the nation’s foundational principles, asserting that the country was at a crossroads where basic American values were under threat.

    Businessman Vivek Ramaswamy: A Call to Traditional Values

    Vivek Ramaswamy’s speech focused on what he described as a national identity crisis. He urged a return to the foundational values of 1776, calling for policies that emphasize merit and the rule of law. Ramaswamy criticized the current administration for what he viewed as a departure from these core values, replacing patriotism, hard work, and family with race, gender, sexuality, and climate as primary concerns.

    Ramaswamy argued, “What does it mean to be a Republican in the year 2024? What does it mean to be an American in the year 2024?” He stressed the importance of sealing the southern border on day one and reducing the influence of unelected bureaucrats. He portrayed Donald Trump as the leader who would revive these American ideals, emphasizing that success and excellence are unifying forces.

    Former South Carolina Governor and Ambassador to the UN Nikki Haley: The Unifying Voice

    In perhaps the most critical speech of the night, former South Carolina Governor Nikki Haley took the stage amidst mixed reactions. Haley began by expressing her strong endorsement for Donald Trump, which eventually garnered a standing ovation. Haley emphasized the importance of unity within the Republican Party and the need to expand its base by welcoming people with diverse backgrounds and experiences.

    Haley highlighted her tenure as Trump’s ambassador to the United Nations, praising his foreign policy achievements. She contrasted Trump’s strong stance with the current administration’s approach, noting that under Trump, Vladimir Putin did not invade Ukraine and Iran was significantly restrained. “A strong president doesn’t start wars; a strong president prevents wars,” Haley declared.

    On immigration, Haley criticized the Biden administration’s handling of the border crisis, emphasizing the influx of migrants and the associated security risks. She argued that Trump’s policies had kept the border secure and that a return to these policies was essential for national security. “Under Donald Trump, we didn’t have the border disaster we have today,” she asserted.

    Haley also reached out to Republicans who might have doubts about Trump, acknowledging that she herself did not always agree with him. She stated, “You don’t have to agree with Trump 100% of the time to vote for him. Take it from me. I haven’t always agreed with President Trump. But we agree more often than we disagree.” Haley’s message was clear: while Republicans may not always agree with Trump, they share a common goal of keeping America strong and safe. She called for Republicans to unite and work together to save the nation, highlighting that no president can fix all problems alone. “Together as a party, let us come together as a people, as one country strong and proud,” she concluded.

    Florida Governor Ron DeSantis: Echoing the Sentiment

    Florida Governor Ron DeSantis followed Haley, echoing her sentiments about the stark differences between life under Trump and the Biden administration. DeSantis criticized Biden’s handling of the Afghanistan withdrawal and border security, reinforcing the call for unity and the re-election of Trump to restore national security and prosperity.

    DeSantis highlighted the affordability of life under Trump, stating, “Life was more affordable when Donald Trump was president. Our border was safer under the Trump administration and our country was respected when Donald Trump was our commander in chief.” He emphasized that a strong and unified Republican Party was essential to reversing the current administration’s policies.

    Arkansas Governor Sarah Huckabee Sanders: Personal Endorsement

    Sarah Huckabee Sanders shared personal anecdotes to illustrate Donald Trump’s character and leadership. She praised Trump’s policies on crime, education, and China, and called for his return to the White House to ensure a better future for the next generation. Sanders emphasized Trump’s resilience and unwavering commitment to American values.

    She recounted a personal story of President Trump supporting her during challenging times in her role as White House Press Secretary, and she underscored his compassionate side, saying, “That’s the kind of leader he is, courageous under fire, compassionate towards others.” Sanders concluded by expressing her belief that with Trump back in the White House, America could reclaim its greatness.

    Dr. Ben Carson: Faith and Resilience

    Dr. Ben Carson reflected on Trump’s resilience in the face of numerous attacks. He encouraged daily prayers for Trump’s protection and emphasized the need for a moral base in America. Carson’s speech was a call to action for Americans to uphold their values and re-elect Trump to maintain the nation’s greatness.

    Carson invoked a sense of divine protection over Trump, saying, “No weapon formed against you shall prosper.” He highlighted the various challenges Trump had faced, from attempts to ruin his reputation to assassination attempts, and praised his continued resilience. Carson’s message was one of faith, hope, and perseverance in the face of adversity.

    Florida Senator Marco Rubio: The People’s Movement

    Senator Marco Rubio highlighted how Trump had transformed the Republican Party by giving a voice to everyday Americans. He stressed the importance of putting America first and criticized the Biden administration for its economic and security failures. Rubio’s speech was a rallying cry for unity and action to protect the American dream.

    Rubio emphasized the importance of addressing the concerns of ordinary Americans, saying, “These are the Americans who wear the red hats and wait for hours under a blazing sun to hear Trump speak.” He called for policies that prioritize American jobs, secure borders, and a strong national defense, arguing that these are not extreme demands but fundamental expectations of the American people.

    Lara Trump: A Personal Appeal

    Lara Trump provided a heartfelt perspective on the personal sacrifices made by the Trump family. She highlighted Trump’s achievements during his presidency, including economic gains and national security. Lara urged Americans to remember the positive changes under Trump and to support his return to office.

    She recounted the emotional experience of witnessing the assassination attempt on Trump, emphasizing his resilience and determination. “Donald Trump is a lion. He is bold, he is strong, he is fearless, and he is exactly what this country needs right now,” she said. Lara’s speech was a personal appeal to voters to see beyond the headlines and recognize Trump’s commitment to America.

    You could feel the energy at the RNC Night 2, bringing together political foes, with unity as the central message. The speakers emphasized the importance of coming together to ensure a safe, strong, and prosperous America under Donald Trump’s leadership. Whether this message of unity will remain throughout the campaign remains to be seen. We are here to give you a non-partisan look at presidential politics so you can make decisions based on the facts we present. Stay critical, stay engaged, and stay informed.

    Questions to Ask Yourself After Reading:

    Do I think the Republican party is more unified now?

    Will this unity message last through November?

  • Trump Selects J.D. Vance as 2024 Running Mate

    Trump Selects J.D. Vance as 2024 Running Mate

    After what may be the best-kept secret in modern presidential politics, Donald Trump has finally chosen J.D. Vance, the senator from Ohio, to be his running mate in the 2024 election.

    J.D. Vance was born in Middletown, Ohio, to a working-class family. Raised mostly by his maternal grandparents due to his parent’s divorce and his mother’s alcohol and drug abuse, Vance enlisted in the U.S. Marine Corps after graduating from Middletown High School in 2003. He deployed to Iraq and fought in the Iraq War.

    After his service, Vance attended The Ohio State University, earning a bachelor’s degree in political science and philosophy. He then studied at Yale Law School, obtaining his JD. Post-law school, Vance worked for the law firm Sidley Austin LLP and various investment firms nationwide.

    Vance gained fame in 2016 with the publication of “Hillbilly Elegy: A Memoir of a Family and Culture in Crisis,” which detailed his upbringing and painted a bleak picture of rural life, describing poverty as a “family tradition” for many. The book quickly became a bestseller, making Vance a sought-after political commentator.

    In 2016, Vance moved back to Ohio to start a nonprofit aimed at helping disadvantaged children and addressing issues such as drug addiction and the opioid epidemic. Although the organization eventually folded, he later started an investment firm in Cincinnati.

    In 2021, when Rob Portman announced he would not seek reelection, Vance entered the race to fill his Senate seat. With an endorsement from Donald Trump, Vance was elected to the U.S. Senate in 2022. In the Senate, Vance serves on the Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs Committee; the Commerce, Science, and Transportation Committee; the Joint Economic Committee; and the Special Committee on Aging.

    Where J.D. Vance Stands on the Issues:

    Immigration:

    In one of his first Senate campaign advertisements, Vance released a video blaming Joe Biden for the border crisis and its effects on Ohio communities. He said, “Joe Biden’s open border is killing Ohioans. With more illegal drugs and more Democrat voters pouring into this country.” Vance supports finishing the border wall, opposes amnesty for illegal immigrants, and advocates for a merit-based system for legal immigration. He has also expressed concerns about immigrants being a source of cheap labor, suggesting, “If you cannot hire illegal migrants to staff your hotels, then you have to go to one of the seven million prime-age American men who are out of the labor force and find some way to re-engage them.”

    Abortion:

    Initially favoring a 15-week ban, Vance has recently supported leaving the decision to the states. In a “Face the Nation”, he stated, “I am pro-life. I want to save as many babies as possible. And sure, I think it’s totally reasonable to say that late-term abortions should not happen with reasonable exceptions. But I think Trump’s approach here is trying to settle a very tough issue and actually empower the American people to decide it for themselves.”

    Ukraine:

    Vance has long opposed funding for the war in Ukraine. In an op-ed for the New York Times, he argued, “Ukraine needs more soldiers than it can field, even with draconian conscription policies. And it needs more matériel than the United States can provide. This reality must inform any future Ukraine policy, from further congressional aid to the diplomatic course set by the president.” He accused President Biden of failing “to articulate even basic facts about what Ukraine needs and how this aid will change the reality on the ground.”

    Middle East:

    Vance has staunchly supported Israel throughout its war in Gaza, defending their wartime policies. 

    He led the effort to consider and vote on aid to Ukraine and Israel in separate packages. In a memo circulated among Republicans, he stated, “Israel has a clear plan, and we have a clear means of helping them to fulfill that plan — by providing very specific munitions to enable Israel to conduct a limited operation with a view to neutralizing the threat Hamas poses to Israel. We have no such plan for the Russia-Ukraine War.”

    2020 Election:

    Vance believes the 2020 election was stolen from Trump and has suggested there were significant problems that require political solutions. He stated in an interview with George Stephanopoulos, “If I had been vice president, I would have told the states, like Pennsylvania, Georgia, and so many others, that we needed to have multiple slates of electors and I think the U.S. Congress should have fought over it from there. That is the legitimate way to deal with an election that a lot of folks, including me, think had a lot of problems in 2020.” He has dismissed Trump’s role in the January 6 events, saying on CNN, “Look, Jan. 6 was a bad day. It was a riot. But the idea that Donald Trump endangered anyone’s lives when he told them to protest peacefully, it’s just absurd.”

    Economy:

    In his “Face the Nation” interview, Vance called for broad-based tariffs on imports, particularly from China, to protect American industries from unfair competition, which he attributes to slave labor rather than superior workers. He said, “…we need to apply some broad-based tariffs, especially on goods coming in from China and not just solar panels and EV stuff. We need to protect American industries from all of the competition. Because here- here’s the thing, Margaret, the reason China beats us, it’s not because they have better workers, it’s because they’re willing to use slaves–”

    Environment:

    While acknowledging climate change, Vance doubts its anthropogenic causes. He supports drilling for oil in the U.S. and criticizes the Biden administration for subsidizing alternative energy sources and demonizing reliable power sources. In a speech to the American Leadership Forum in 2022, he stated, “I’m skeptical of the idea that climate change is caused purely by man. It’s been changing, as others pointed out, it’s been changing for millennia…”

    ____________________________________________________________________________

    Although Vance was not always a Trump supporter, his perspective has evolved. Initially “Never Trumper,” Vance criticized Trump harshly in 2016 calling him a “terrible candidate” and even saying he was “America’s Hitler.” However, he has since reversed his stance, praising Trump’s presidency and working diligently to secure his second term.

    Former President Trump praised Vance in his announcement on TruthSocial, highlighting Vance’s military service, academic achievements, bestselling memoir, and business career. Trump emphasized Vance’s commitment to American workers and farmers and his dedication to upholding the Constitution and supporting the troops.

    He wrote “After lengthy deliberation and thought and considering the tremendous talents of many others, I have decided that the person best suited to assume the position of Vice President of the United States is Senator J.D. Vance of the great state of Ohio. J.D. honorably served our country in the Marine Corps, graduated from Ohio State University in two years, Summa Cum Laude, and is a Yale Law School graduate, where he was the editor of the Yale Law Journal and President of the Yale Law Veteran Association. J.D.’s book “Hillbilly Elegy” became a Major Best Seller and Movie as it championed the hard-working men and women of our country. J.D. has had a very successful business career in technology and finance, and now, during the campaign will be strongly focused on the people he fought so brilliantly for, the American workers and farmers in Pennsylvania, Michigan, Wisconsin, Ohio, Minnesota, and far beyond. As Vice President J.D. will continue to fight for our Constitution, stand with our troops and we’ll do everything he can to help me MAKE AMERICA GREAT AGAIN. Congratulations to Senator J.D. Vance, his wife, Usha who also graduated from Yale Law School and their three beautiful children. MAGA2024!”

    As we approach the 2024 election, the choice of J.D. Vance as Trump’s running mate adds another layer of complexity to an already dynamic race. Vance’s background and clear positions on critical issues like immigration, abortion, Ukraine, and the economy will significantly influence the political landscape. As election season heats up, it’s essential to stay informed on all matters. Seek out the facts and form your own opinions. This platform aims to provide clear, unbiased information, empowering you to draw your own conclusions. Stay engaged, stay critical, and stay informed.

    Questions to Consider After Reading:

    Do you think J.D. Vance was a good choice for Trump’s VP?

    Should Trump have chosen someone else? Why?

    Is J.D. Vance the strongest candidate to help Donald Trump beat Joe Biden?

  • An Impartial Look at the SAVE Act and Voter Eligibility Debate

    An Impartial Look at the SAVE Act and Voter Eligibility Debate

    With the rising surge of illegal immigrants entering the United States via the US-Mexico Southern Border, concerns are growing among the Republican Party over non-citizens voting in federal elections.

    In the US, each state has different rules regarding local, state, and federal elections, as the Constitution leaves election law in the power of the states. However, Congress can pass a federal bill regarding elections that can be applied to all federal elections across the country. This week, House Democrats and Republicans are again at odds over an immigration bill, with an election spin.

    Next week, the House is scheduled to vote on the Safeguard American Voter Eligibility (SAVE) Act. Introduced by House Republicans, the bill would require “documentary proof of United States citizenship” to vote in federal elections.

    Speaker of the House, Mike Johnson (R-LA), has spent much of his time this week promoting the bill, citing studies and research regarding illegal immigrants voting in federal elections.

    In his 22-page report on the benefits the SAVE Act will provide to American citizens and their election system, Johnson stated, “While falsely claiming the 2016 was ‘stolen’ due to ‘foreign election interference,’ Democrats ignore the real threat of foreign election interference posed when noncitizens are allowed to register and vote in U.S. elections.”

    He continued, “Lax voter registration laws make it possible for noncitizens to register and vote in federal elections while campaign finance loopholes allow noncitizens to fund U.S. election activities – both of which can affect the outcome of our elections.”

    His report also points to examples of non-citizens being removed from voter rolls in several states.

    “Earlier this year, in Massachusetts, Boston Election Department officials disclosed to the Public Interest Legal Foundation that the city had removed 70 noncitizens from the city’s election rolls… In May 2024, Ohio Secretary of State Frank LaRose ordered 137 noncitizens removed from Ohio’s voter rolls… As of May 2023, Virginia Department of Elections officials have removed 1,481 registrations from its official voter rolls with a reported reason for removal due to noncitizen status.”

    The bill defines “documentary proof of American citizenship” as follows:

    • A form of identification issued consistent with the requirements of the REAL ID Act of 2005 that indicates the applicant is a citizen of the United States
    • A valid United States passport
    • The applicant’s official United States military identification card, together with a United States military record of service showing that the applicant’s place of birth was in the United States
    • A valid government-issued photo identification card issued by a Federal, State, or Tribal government showing that the applicant’s place of birth was in the United States
    • A valid government-issued photo identification card issued by a Federal, State, or Tribal government other than an identification described in paragraphs (1) through (4), but only if presented together with one or more of the following:
      • A certified birth certificate issued by a State, a unit of local government in a State, or a Tribal government
      • An extract from a United States hospital record of birth created at the time of the applicant’s birth which indicates that the applicant’s place of birth was in the United States
      • A final adoption decree showing the applicant’s name and that the applicant’s place of birth was in the United States
      • A Consular Report of Birth Abroad of a citizen of the United States or a certification of the applicant’s Report of Birth of a United States citizen issued by the Secretary of State
      • A Naturalization Certificate or Certificate of Citizenship issued by the Secretary of Homeland Security or any other document or method of proof of United States citizenship issued by the Federal government pursuant to the Immigration and Nationality Act
      • An American Indian Card issued by the Department of Homeland Security with the classification ‘KIC’

    Former President Trump has voiced his support of the bill taking to Truth Social, writing, “Republicans must pass the SAVE Act, or go home and cry yourself to sleep… Non-citizen Illegal Migrants are getting the right to vote, being pushed by crooked Democrat Politicians who are not being stopped by an equally dishonest Justice Department.”

    House Democrats have dismissed the bill, with House Minority Whip, Katherine Clark (D-Mass), urging her fellow Democrats to “vote no” on the measure.

    In a recent whip question regarding the bill, Clark stated, “Once again, the ‘party of states’ rights’ would supersede individual state law by amending the National Voter Registration Act (NVRA) to require voters in all states to show ‘documentary proof of citizenship’ (DPOC) in order to register to vote. These changes would prevent Americans from registering to vote with their driver’s license alone, as REAL ID does not indicate citizenship and is in fact available to noncitizens. Under the SAVE Act, for the overwhelming majority of Americans, the only acceptable standalone form of identification for use in voter registration would be a passport (or passport card). A REAL ID drivers’ license, a Tribal ID, or a military ID would be unacceptable unless coupled with additional documentation, such as a birth certificate or an extract from a birth record that proves the applicant was born in the United States. This would be an extreme burden for countless Americans, including military voters, Native voters, people who have changed their names (including tens of millions of American women), the elderly, the young, the poor, and naturalized citizens.”

    However, not all Democrats may be on board with Clark. Back in May of 2024, House Republicans introduced H.R. 192 which would block non-citizens from voting in local D.C. elections. In that vote, 52 Democratic House members broke from their party lines and voted with Republicans to pass the bill.

    There is a chance some Democrats will join their Republican colleagues in this vote, but the bill is most likely dead on arrival (DOA) in the Democrat-controlled Senate, just like H.R. 192 was in May.

    In stark opposition to the bill, the White House released a statement saying, “This bill would do nothing to safeguard our elections, but it would make it much harder for all eligible Americans to register to vote and increase the risk that eligible voters are purged from voter rolls.”

    Even if the bill were to pass the Senate, President Biden is expected to veto the measure, making this bill DOA no matter where it goes.

    Questions to ask yourself after reading:

    Do I think there should be a federal law requiring proof of citizenship to vote?

    Do I think non-citizens should be allowed to vote in federal elections? State? Local?

    Does my state already require me to show ID when voting?

    • If not, should my state require it?

    Does election integrity matter to me?

    What do I think are the safest and most open forms of elections?

    Do I think there’s a better solution than what’s proposed?

    As we approach the 2024 election, it can be easy to get caught up in the potential presidential politics of the future and overlook the current governance that will impact those elections. As election season heats up, make sure to stay informed on all matters. Seek out the facts and form your own opinions. This platform aims to provide clear, unbiased information, empowering you to draw your own conclusions. Stay engaged, stay critical, and stay informed.

  • Could Joe Biden Be Replaced as the Democratic Party Presidential Nominee?

    Could Joe Biden Be Replaced as the Democratic Party Presidential Nominee?

    After his performance in the first debate of the 2024 presidential election, President Joe Biden is now facing calls from those in his own party to step down as the Democratic nominee.

    These calls to step down come after months of Republican lawmakers criticizing the president’s mental ability and stamina, as well as Special Counsel Robert Hur’s decision not to pursue charges against Biden in his classified documents case due to his “poor memory” and old age.

    In the Special Counsel’s statement not to pursue charges, Hur wrote, “…at trial, Mr. Biden would likely present himself to a jury, as he did during our interview of him, as a sympathetic, well-meaning, elderly man with a poor memory. Based on our direct interactions with and observations of him… It would be difficult to convince a jury that they should convict him–by then a former president well into his eighties–of a serious felony that requires a mental state of willfulness.”

    Since then, White House Press Secretary Karine Jean-Pierre and other top Biden administration officials have been vigorously defending the President and his ability to do the job, saying Hur’s report does not “[live] in reality.”

    But on Thursday, Americans were able to get a rare glimpse of an unscripted and unprompted Joe Biden, and their reaction was all but positive.

    Now, with one in three Democrats saying Biden should not run for re-election, top Democratic officials have to juggle whether they stick with their nominee or make a last-ditch effort to defeat Donald Trump.

    Never before has an incumbent President been removed at a party convention or stepped down due to an inability to do the job. 

    In these unprecedented times, it can be tough to get the facts and your questions answered. Here’s all you need to know without the spin:

    Can there be a new Democratic Nominee?

    There are two possibilities in which there can be a new 2024 Democratic nominee.

    The first: President Biden decides to step down from the presidency on his own, releasing all the delegates bound to him and allowing a new vote for new candidates at the convention in late August.

    The second: A split convention.

    There are an estimated 4,672 delegates up for grabs in 2024. Of these, 3,933 are pledged delegates and 739 are super-delegates, who have no allegiance to any electoral outcome. Super-delegates are not permitted to vote on the first ballot for president at the convention but can vote on the second if no candidate reaches the 1,968 pledged delegates needed to clinch the nomination.

    After sweeping every state in the Democratic primary, President Biden has received 3,896 delegates. This means that, by all metrics, he should easily clinch the nomination on August 22. But there’s a catch.

    The 2024 DNC Rules clearly state, “All delegates to the National Convention pledged to a presidential candidate shall in all good conscience reflect the sentiments of those who elected them.”

    The phrase “good conscience” indicates that delegates are not legally bound to the electoral outcome of the primary election results they represent.

    Therefore, technically, if enough delegates were to defect from their electoral outcome to support another candidate, a split convention could occur, opening the door for unbound super-delegates to vote and for last-minute challengers to emerge in the following rounds of voting.

    Who would replace Biden?

    Ever since the debate ended, political pundits have been speculating about who could replace Biden if he were to step down.

    The names most frequently mentioned include Vice President Kamala Harris, California Governor Gavin Newsom, Michigan Governor Gretchen Whitmer, Kentucky Governor Andy Beshear, Illinois Governor J.B. Pritzker, and former First Lady Michelle Obama.

    But how would these candidates fare against Donald Trump?

    In a post-debate poll conducted by Reuters/Ipsos, Trump and Biden remain in a dead heat at 40% each.

    All considered rising stars and the future of the Democratic party, in a hypothetical matchup against former President Trump, Kamala Harris loses by 1, Newsom by 3, Whitmer by 5, Beshear by 4, and Pritzker by 6.

    The only Democrat polled who beat Trump was Michelle Obama with a staggering 11-point advantage over the former president. However, the former First Lady has been adamant about her resistance to political life.

    In March, her director of communications told NBC News, “As former First Lady Michelle Obama has expressed several times over the years, she will not be running for president. Mrs. Obama supports President Joe Biden and Vice President Kamala Harris’ re-election campaign.”

    Does Biden want to step down?

    Seems like no. Despite his debate performance, President Biden immediately agreed to the next debate hosted by ABC in September.

    At a campaign rally the following day in North Carolina, Biden addressed the crowd, saying, “Folks, I might not walk as easily or talk as smoothly as I used to. I might not debate as well as I used to. But what I do know is how to tell the truth.”

    On a Wednesday call with top allies and advisors, Biden was clear about his desire and ability to remain in the race.

    NBC White House Correspondent Gabe Gutierrez reported on X, “President Biden on call with staff just now: ‘Let me say this as clearly as I possibly can, as simply and straightforward as I can: I am running. No one is pushing me out. I’m not leaving. I’m in this race to the end and we’re going to win.’”

    However, there have been reports that Biden is “weighing his options” on whether to pull out.

    According to the New York Times, “President Biden has told key allies that he knows the coming days are crucial and understands that he may not be able to salvage his candidacy if he cannot convince voters that he is up to the job after a disastrous debate performance last week.”

    The article continued, “‘He knows if he has two more events like that, we’re in a different place’ by the end of the weekend, said one of the allies, referring to Mr. Biden’s halting and unfocused performance in the debate.” This ally spoke anonymously.

    The most recent post-debate New York Times/Siena Poll of registered voters nationwide has Biden losing to Trump 49% to 43%—a six-point bump for the former president from the same poll conducted just a week earlier.

    Questions to ask yourself after reading:

    Should Biden be replaced as the Democratic Nominee?

    Can any other candidate beat Donald Trump?

    Can a person run for president and win in two months?

    What qualities in a president are most important to me?

    • Do any of these alternatives possess those qualities more than the presumptive nominees?

    Would I feel more inclined to vote if one of these alternatives was on the ballot instead of Joe Biden?

    Would an alternative Democratic nominee change the party of the president I plan to vote for? 

    With less than two months until the Democratic National Convention, Democrats are on the clock in deciding whether or not to replace their nominee.

    While some may seem like more formidable candidates than Biden, there is one thing Democrats don’t have that can’t be bought with any amount of money in the world: time.

    If there were to be a new Democratic nominee, they would have just over two months to convince a majority of Americans that they should be their president. That would be unprecedented, but these are unprecedented times.