Author: Amber McCormack

  • Should Election Day Become a Federal Holiday? Weighing the Benefits and Drawbacks

    Should Election Day Become a Federal Holiday? Weighing the Benefits and Drawbacks

    Election Day is always held on the Tuesday after the first Monday in November during an election year. Congress codified this tradition in 1845 to account for the nation’s largely agrarian labor force who needed most other days of the week to tend to their crops, travel, or worship. 

    In modern times, many argue that a Tuesday Election Day poses significant inconvenience to working people, and should therefore be designated as a federal holiday.  If Election Day were declared a federal holiday, all federal government employees would gain a paid day off on Election Day. Recently, lawmakers have introduced bills to codify Election Day as a federal holiday. These bills have not gained traction in Congress, despite the fact that 65% of Americans favor making Election Day a federal holiday. Given that weekday workers may struggle to find time to vote on a Tuesday, some argue that a federal holiday would provide more benefits than risks. Conversely, others believe it would have little impact on voter turnout and might harm hourly workers.

    Arguments in Favor of Federal Voting Holiday

    Proponents of making Election Day a federal holiday argue the policy would promote higher voter turnout in elections by allowing more people to vote without sacrificing a day off work. In the 2020 election, one poll found that 13.1% of participants who were registered voters did not vote because they were busy or had a scheduling conflict. If Election Day was granted federal holiday status, all federal employees – numbering over two million Americans – would be able to vote without worrying about missing a day of work. Although the federal government cannot require private companies to observe holidays, around 75% of civilian workers receive paid holidays that often align with the federal schedule.

    Considering that the United States had considerably lower voting-age turnout in 2020 than many comparable countries with weekend or holiday election days, some argue that a federal Election Day holiday would help align the U.S. with the rest of the world. Additionally, proponents argue that creating a national holiday supports democratic ideals and serves as a reminder of the importance of elections. Creating a federal Election Day holiday, according to its supporters, celebrates democracy and instills civic values in American citizens. 

    Arguments Against Federal Voting Holiday

    Those against making Election Day a federal holiday argue that such a large focus on one day is misguided, since almost 70% of ballots in the 2020 presidential election were cast before Election Day. 

    Many argue that advocates should redirect their efforts to create early voting options in states like Alabama and Mississippi, where early voting is prohibited. Since early voting policies give working people the freedom to cast ballots on weekends or other convenient days, opponents say these policies would eliminate the need for a federal voting holiday. 

    Additionally, opponents emphasize that private employers are not required to recognize or give paid time off for federal holidays. Numerous employees, especially those who are part-time or blue-collar workers, would likely not be included in the paid time off associated with federal holidays. Discrepancies between federal and private holiday policies might make it especially difficult for working parents who might have to find childcare if their kids had the day off school. Finally, opponents argue that making Election Day a federal holiday would be costly, with one analyst estimating that the added day of compensation would cost $818 million every other year. 

    Conclusion

    The debate over making Election Day a federal holiday reflects broader concerns about voting accessibility and voter turnout in the U.S.. Proponents argue that a federal holiday would encourage more participation in the democratic process and align the U.S. with other countries. Opponents counter that a holiday may not significantly increase turnout and could even create challenges for some workers. As discussions continue, the decision to designate Election Day as a federal holiday will hinge on whether its perceived benefits outweigh its potential drawbacks in promoting a more inclusive democracy.

  • Automatic Voter Registration: A Closer Look at the Ongoing Debate

    Automatic Voter Registration: A Closer Look at the Ongoing Debate


    In all states except North Dakota, eligible voters must register to vote before casting a ballot in any election. Each state’s voter registration requirements vary, but most states retain voters’ name, date of birth, address, and party affiliation. While the 1993 Voter Registration Act (also known as the “Motor Voter” law) allowed eligible voters to fill out a voter registration form at the same time they sought or renewed their driver’s license, it was not until 2015 that some states adopted fully automatic voter registration. Automatic Voter Registration (AVR) is a process whereby eligible voters’ registration information is automatically submitted or updated when they interact with government agencies like the DMV or Department of Health. Essentially, AVR makes voter registration an opt-out, rather than an opt-in, process. Twenty-four states and the District of Columbia currently use some form of AVR. 

    How AVR Works

    There are two main types of Automatic Voter Registration (AVR): front-end opt-out and back-end opt-out.

    • Front-end opt-out: When eligible voters interact with a government agency, they can choose whether to register by filling out a form or checking a box. Some states confirm registration afterward with a notification.
    • Back-end opt-out: Government agencies automatically register voters unless they decline. After the interaction, voters receive a notification giving them a chance to opt out within a certain timeframe.

    Sixteen states and D.C. use front-end opt-out, while eight states use back-end opt-out.

    Arguments in Favor of AVR

    Supporters argue that AVR increases access to elections and ease of voting. They claim non-automatic voter registration procedures are inefficient and contribute to low voter turnout due to the need for potential voters to take an extra step before they vote. Moreover, proponents argue that by automatically updating voter addresses during interactions with government agencies, AVR decreases the likelihood that voters show up to an incorrect polling place due to outdated registration information. Supporters claim that up-to-date voter registration information not only reduces confusion on election day, but also prevents jurisdictions from misallocating resources across polling places based on outdated records. Those who endorse AVR also claim it significantly reduces costs associated with paper forms, postage, provisional ballots, and same-day registration

    Moreover, proponents of AVR assert that it increases the number of registered voters compared to non-automatic registration. A case study conducted by the Center for American Progress found AVR to be an effective means of engaging voters. According to the study, Oregon’s AVR program registered 116,000 people who were otherwise unlikely to have registered. Moreover, it found that Oregon’s electorate became more representative of the state’s population after AVR was put into place. Another case study from Georgia found that AVR registered and updated voter information at a higher rate than other registration sources, increasing the state’s registered voter population from 78% in 2016 to 98% in 2020. 

    Arguments Against AVR

    Critics of AVR argue that as more agencies coordinate to access and update voter information, the risk of errors and security breaches increases. They cite one 2018 instance when the California DMV was overwhelmed by an influx of potential voters, resulting in errors such as duplicate registrations and incorrect information being input into voter records. Opponents argue inaccuracies like those in California may cause more work for election officials because duplicate registrations must be corrected individually. Critics also claim an electronic system is vulnerable to major security risks, citing an incident when California’s new DMV voter registration system appeared to have been targeted by foreign hackers. In light of the risk of data breaches, some opponents of AVR argue that the automatic collection of voter information puts citizens who intentionally do not register, such as domestic violence survivors, at risk. 

    Opponents also question the extent of AVR’s impact on voter registration rates and voting behavior. They argue that the increased voter registration numbers cited by supporters of AVR fail to account for voters who would have updated their registration without AVR. Additionally, they claim that even if AVR increases the amount of registered voters, newly registered voters who typically do not vote are still unlikely to vote

    Conclusion

    AVR remains a key issue nationwide, with several states adopting or adjusting AVR policies. In 2023 Minnesota, New Mexico, and Pennsylvania became the newest additions to the list of states that use AVR in some form. As the conversation over AVR’s pros and cons continues, costs, data security, and voter turnout are likely to remain central topics of debate.

  • Amber McCormack

    Amber McCormack

    Amber McCormack is from Milwaukee, Wisconsin, and is a rising senior at Loyola University Chicago pursuing a major in Political Science and minors in Spanish, Sociolegal Studies, and European Studies. While at school, she is one of the Project Managers for Loyola Votes, an organization at Loyola University Chicago that aims to encourage all students to vote in local, state, and federal elections. She is also on the executive board for another student organization, Inside Government, which seeks to provide students with a better understanding of a career in public service and provide students with advice and tips to get started with their careers. She has been passionate about public service and law throughout her life and expanded those passions through involvement in student government, key club, and mock trial in high school.  In her free time, she enjoys shopping with friends, exploring new coffee shops, and watching sitcoms. After graduating this fall, she plans to attend law school with dreams of pursuing a career in civil rights law.

    LinkedIn