Category: Election 2024

  • A Guide to the Republican National Convention: Day 3

    A Guide to the Republican National Convention: Day 3


    Day three of the RNC convention featured speeches from Texas Governor Greg Abbott and the newly announced vice presidential candidate, J.D. Trump. These speeches shared several common themes, including concerns about national security, border control, energy policies, and the current administration’s approach. This event marked the first public appearance of the newly announced vice presidential candidate, J.D Vance, and his wife, Usha. Below is a summary of key points from some of the speakers, presented in a non-partisan manner.

    Jim and Sue Colton – Arizona Residents
    Jim, a fifth-generation rancher from Arizona whose property lies along the Arizona-Mexico border, expressed significant concerns about border security during his speech. He emphasized, “Joe Biden’s open border policy is our country’s greatest national security threat,” and cited incidents including “our house being broken into twice” and “a border control agent being shot five times by drug smugglers on our ranch.” Jim noted that during the Trump administration, construction of a border wall on his property was nearing completion but was halted under the Biden administration, which he claimed led to a reported five-fold increase in unauthorized crossings.

    Peter Navarro
    Peter Navarro, former U.S. Trade and Manufacturing Policy Director, was recently imprisoned in Miami for defying a subpoena. He claimed that Joe Biden and his Department of “Injustice” were responsible for his imprisonment. Navarro warned, “If they can come for me, if they can come for Donald Trump, be careful, they will come for you.” He expressed his disappointment in the Biden administration, criticizing what he perceives as corruption in all three branches of government, as well as Biden’s border policy, economic management, and belief in the “Green New Scam.”

    David Lara
    David Lara, an Arizona resident, expressed concern over border control, stating that “small towns like mine bear the brunt of the chaos.” He called for the Biden-Harris administration to put “Americans first” and criticized them for neglecting his town of San Luis, saying, “They have done nothing to stop it, and everything to make it worse.” Lara expressed appreciation for Donald Trump visiting his town and “believing in borders.”

    Greg Abbott
    Greg Abbott, governor of Texas, expressed his views on border security. He believes that “America needs a president that will secure our border” and that the president’s most sacred duty is to secure the country. He criticized Joe Biden’s border policy, stating that it has allowed “rapists, murderers, and terrorists” into the country. Abbott mentioned his initiative to bus illegal immigrants to D.C. until “we secure the border,” and expressed confidence that Donald Trump will enforce immigration laws, including arresting or deporting illegal immigrants.

    Sarah Phillips
    Sarah Phillips, a petroleum engineer, expressed her support for Donald Trump’s energy policies. She stated, “Trump is high energy and supports energy, while Biden is low energy and is against energy.” Phillips criticized Biden’s approach, referring to the Green New Deal as a “scam” and accusing Biden of declaring “war” on the oil and gas industry from day one. She emphasized the importance of fossil fuels, stating, “Our society and standard of living could not exist without fossil fuels.” Phillips believes that under Trump’s administration, “America’s great economic revival will be powered by American energy.”

    Trent Conaway
    Trent Conaway, governor of East Palestine, Ohio, criticized what he perceives as Joe Biden’s lack of response and action when a train derailed, spilling chemicals in his town. He stated that the White House was silent on the matter and that he did not hear from Vice President Kamala Harris. Conaway praised Donald Trump for visiting and “caring” and “listening to us,” while contrasting this with Joe Biden’s visit, which he described as “forced and scripted.” He labeled the Biden administration as a “train wreck” and called for action, stating, “Before President Biden derails our nation, we need to act.”

    Kimberly Guilfoyle
    Kimberly Guilfoyle, Trump campaign advisor and fiancée of Donald Trump Jr., views the upcoming election as pivotal for the future of the United States. She argues that the choice is between “safety and chaos,” urging voters to elect Donald Trump for what she describes as his vision of ‘American greatness’ versus Joe Biden’s ‘visions for American weakness.’ Guilfoyle criticizes Biden’s leadership capabilities, claiming he ‘cannot even lead himself off of stage.’ She opposes what she perceives as the indoctrination of children in schools and the inclusion of ‘“biological men” in girls’ sports, advocating instead for a return to national pride, where “freedom of speech is respected” and “cancel culture is ended”.

    Shabbos Kestenbaum
    Shabbos Kestenbaum, a first-generation Jewish Harvard alumni, is a plaintiff in a lawsuit against Harvard, alleging a failure to combat anti-Semitism. He contends that Harvard students are taught “not how to think but what to think.” As a registered Democrat, Kestenbaum expresses concern that “the far left has abandoned not only the Jewish people but also the American people.” He criticizes what he sees as ideological poisoning within the Democratic Party, particularly impacting young American students. Kestenbaum denounces what he terms as ‘radicalism’ on American campuses and streets, asserting that such movements lack legitimacy.

    Michael Waltz
    Michael Waltz, the first Green Beret ever elected to Congress and former White House advisor, highlighted differences between administrations in his speech. He praised the Trump administration for its actions against ISIS, policies towards Iran, and support for Israel. He contrasted this with what he sees as President Biden’s focus on issues such as pronouns, base renaming, diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI), and military technologies like electric tanks. Waltz criticized Biden’s decision to withdraw troops from Afghanistan, calling it ‘disgraceful’ and a “stain on our national conscience.” He emphasized his belief in achieving peace “through American strength” during the Trump administration.

    Donald Trump Jr.
    Donald Trump Jr., son of Donald Trump, expressed his admiration for his father, describing him as having “a heart of a lion” and showing resilience after an assassination attempt. He honored the life of Corey Compertore, who died during a recent rally. Trump Jr. criticized the Democrats, accusing them of lying about Joe Biden’s fitness for office and Hunter Biden’s laptop. He claimed that under the Biden administration “nothing is built, nothing is back, and nothing is better.”

    J.D. Vance
    J.D. Vance, the vice presidential candidate, shared his belief that Donald Trump did not need to run again, stating that “he didn’t need the politics, but the country needed him.” He posed a question to the audience about the importance of being governed by a party that debates ideas and seeks the best solutions. Vance accepted the vice presidential nomination and shared personal details about his childhood, including being raised by his grandmother in a small rural town, enlisting in the Marines after 9/11, attending Ohio State University, and then Yale Law School, where he met his wife. He emphasized the need for a leader who “fights for the people who built this country” and opposes the Green New Deal. Vance concluded his speech by expressing his hope for the nation to “thrive for centuries to come.”

  • A Guide to the Republican National Convention: Day 2

    A Guide to the Republican National Convention: Day 2

    On the second night of the Republican National Convention, the theme “Make America Safe Again” resonated throughout the evening, but the underlying message of unity was unmistakable. The night saw a series of powerful speeches from key Republican figures, all rallying behind former President Donald Trump. They addressed various issues from economic policies to national security, emphasizing the need for a cohesive Republican front to ensure a return to the White House.

    Ted Cruz: The Border Crisis

    Senator Ted Cruz delivered a poignant address focusing on the border crisis. He painted a vivid picture of the human cost associated with illegal immigration, citing numerous tragic examples of Americans who had suffered due to crimes committed by illegal immigrants. Cruz emphasized the magnitude of the crisis by comparing the influx of illegal immigrants to filling 639 arenas, each holding about 18,000 people.

    Cruz passionately stated, “Every day Americans are dying… This is evil and it’s wrong. And it is happening every damn day.” He blamed the Biden administration’s policies for this crisis and asserted that under Trump, the border was secure. Cruz called for a return to strict border enforcement to protect American lives and restore safety.

    Rep. Steve Scalise (R-LA): Critiquing the Biden Administration

    Rep. Steve Scalise (LA-1) offered a sharp critique of the Biden administration’s handling of the economy and energy policies. Scalise highlighted the stark differences between the current administration and Trump’s tenure, focusing on job losses and energy dependence.

    He pointed out that while President Biden approved the Nord Stream pipeline for Russia, he canceled the Keystone pipeline in the U.S., leading to thousands of lost American jobs. Scalise also criticized Biden for allowing Iran and Venezuela to export oil while hindering American natural gas exports. He stressed, “President Biden waived taxes on Chinese solar panels, but he raised taxes on Americans.”

    Scalise underscored the need to re-elect Donald Trump to restore American energy dominance and make the Trump tax cuts permanent. He also touched on border security, promising that a Republican majority would pass H.R.2 to secure the border and finish building the wall.

    Speaker of the House Mike Johnson (R-LA): Law and Order

    House Speaker Mike Johnson emphasized the Republican Party’s commitment to law and order. He announced an immediate investigation into the assassination attempt on Donald Trump, portraying the Republicans as staunch defenders of American values and the rule of law.

    Johnson stated, “We in the Republican Party are the law and order team. We always have been and we always will be the advocates for the rule of law.” He stressed the importance of a united Republican Party to safeguard the nation’s foundational principles, asserting that the country was at a crossroads where basic American values were under threat.

    Businessman Vivek Ramaswamy: A Call to Traditional Values

    Vivek Ramaswamy’s speech focused on what he described as a national identity crisis. He urged a return to the foundational values of 1776, calling for policies that emphasize merit and the rule of law. Ramaswamy criticized the current administration for what he viewed as a departure from these core values, replacing patriotism, hard work, and family with race, gender, sexuality, and climate as primary concerns.

    Ramaswamy argued, “What does it mean to be a Republican in the year 2024? What does it mean to be an American in the year 2024?” He stressed the importance of sealing the southern border on day one and reducing the influence of unelected bureaucrats. He portrayed Donald Trump as the leader who would revive these American ideals, emphasizing that success and excellence are unifying forces.

    Former South Carolina Governor and Ambassador to the UN Nikki Haley: The Unifying Voice

    In perhaps the most critical speech of the night, former South Carolina Governor Nikki Haley took the stage amidst mixed reactions. Haley began by expressing her strong endorsement for Donald Trump, which eventually garnered a standing ovation. Haley emphasized the importance of unity within the Republican Party and the need to expand its base by welcoming people with diverse backgrounds and experiences.

    Haley highlighted her tenure as Trump’s ambassador to the United Nations, praising his foreign policy achievements. She contrasted Trump’s strong stance with the current administration’s approach, noting that under Trump, Vladimir Putin did not invade Ukraine and Iran was significantly restrained. “A strong president doesn’t start wars; a strong president prevents wars,” Haley declared.

    On immigration, Haley criticized the Biden administration’s handling of the border crisis, emphasizing the influx of migrants and the associated security risks. She argued that Trump’s policies had kept the border secure and that a return to these policies was essential for national security. “Under Donald Trump, we didn’t have the border disaster we have today,” she asserted.

    Haley also reached out to Republicans who might have doubts about Trump, acknowledging that she herself did not always agree with him. She stated, “You don’t have to agree with Trump 100% of the time to vote for him. Take it from me. I haven’t always agreed with President Trump. But we agree more often than we disagree.” Haley’s message was clear: while Republicans may not always agree with Trump, they share a common goal of keeping America strong and safe. She called for Republicans to unite and work together to save the nation, highlighting that no president can fix all problems alone. “Together as a party, let us come together as a people, as one country strong and proud,” she concluded.

    Florida Governor Ron DeSantis: Echoing the Sentiment

    Florida Governor Ron DeSantis followed Haley, echoing her sentiments about the stark differences between life under Trump and the Biden administration. DeSantis criticized Biden’s handling of the Afghanistan withdrawal and border security, reinforcing the call for unity and the re-election of Trump to restore national security and prosperity.

    DeSantis highlighted the affordability of life under Trump, stating, “Life was more affordable when Donald Trump was president. Our border was safer under the Trump administration and our country was respected when Donald Trump was our commander in chief.” He emphasized that a strong and unified Republican Party was essential to reversing the current administration’s policies.

    Arkansas Governor Sarah Huckabee Sanders: Personal Endorsement

    Sarah Huckabee Sanders shared personal anecdotes to illustrate Donald Trump’s character and leadership. She praised Trump’s policies on crime, education, and China, and called for his return to the White House to ensure a better future for the next generation. Sanders emphasized Trump’s resilience and unwavering commitment to American values.

    She recounted a personal story of President Trump supporting her during challenging times in her role as White House Press Secretary, and she underscored his compassionate side, saying, “That’s the kind of leader he is, courageous under fire, compassionate towards others.” Sanders concluded by expressing her belief that with Trump back in the White House, America could reclaim its greatness.

    Dr. Ben Carson: Faith and Resilience

    Dr. Ben Carson reflected on Trump’s resilience in the face of numerous attacks. He encouraged daily prayers for Trump’s protection and emphasized the need for a moral base in America. Carson’s speech was a call to action for Americans to uphold their values and re-elect Trump to maintain the nation’s greatness.

    Carson invoked a sense of divine protection over Trump, saying, “No weapon formed against you shall prosper.” He highlighted the various challenges Trump had faced, from attempts to ruin his reputation to assassination attempts, and praised his continued resilience. Carson’s message was one of faith, hope, and perseverance in the face of adversity.

    Florida Senator Marco Rubio: The People’s Movement

    Senator Marco Rubio highlighted how Trump had transformed the Republican Party by giving a voice to everyday Americans. He stressed the importance of putting America first and criticized the Biden administration for its economic and security failures. Rubio’s speech was a rallying cry for unity and action to protect the American dream.

    Rubio emphasized the importance of addressing the concerns of ordinary Americans, saying, “These are the Americans who wear the red hats and wait for hours under a blazing sun to hear Trump speak.” He called for policies that prioritize American jobs, secure borders, and a strong national defense, arguing that these are not extreme demands but fundamental expectations of the American people.

    Lara Trump: A Personal Appeal

    Lara Trump provided a heartfelt perspective on the personal sacrifices made by the Trump family. She highlighted Trump’s achievements during his presidency, including economic gains and national security. Lara urged Americans to remember the positive changes under Trump and to support his return to office.

    She recounted the emotional experience of witnessing the assassination attempt on Trump, emphasizing his resilience and determination. “Donald Trump is a lion. He is bold, he is strong, he is fearless, and he is exactly what this country needs right now,” she said. Lara’s speech was a personal appeal to voters to see beyond the headlines and recognize Trump’s commitment to America.

    You could feel the energy at the RNC Night 2, bringing together political foes, with unity as the central message. The speakers emphasized the importance of coming together to ensure a safe, strong, and prosperous America under Donald Trump’s leadership. Whether this message of unity will remain throughout the campaign remains to be seen. We are here to give you a non-partisan look at presidential politics so you can make decisions based on the facts we present. Stay critical, stay engaged, and stay informed.

    Questions to Ask Yourself After Reading:

    Do I think the Republican party is more unified now?

    Will this unity message last through November?

  • Trump Selects J.D. Vance as 2024 Running Mate

    Trump Selects J.D. Vance as 2024 Running Mate

    After what may be the best-kept secret in modern presidential politics, Donald Trump has finally chosen J.D. Vance, the senator from Ohio, to be his running mate in the 2024 election.

    J.D. Vance was born in Middletown, Ohio, to a working-class family. Raised mostly by his maternal grandparents due to his parent’s divorce and his mother’s alcohol and drug abuse, Vance enlisted in the U.S. Marine Corps after graduating from Middletown High School in 2003. He deployed to Iraq and fought in the Iraq War.

    After his service, Vance attended The Ohio State University, earning a bachelor’s degree in political science and philosophy. He then studied at Yale Law School, obtaining his JD. Post-law school, Vance worked for the law firm Sidley Austin LLP and various investment firms nationwide.

    Vance gained fame in 2016 with the publication of “Hillbilly Elegy: A Memoir of a Family and Culture in Crisis,” which detailed his upbringing and painted a bleak picture of rural life, describing poverty as a “family tradition” for many. The book quickly became a bestseller, making Vance a sought-after political commentator.

    In 2016, Vance moved back to Ohio to start a nonprofit aimed at helping disadvantaged children and addressing issues such as drug addiction and the opioid epidemic. Although the organization eventually folded, he later started an investment firm in Cincinnati.

    In 2021, when Rob Portman announced he would not seek reelection, Vance entered the race to fill his Senate seat. With an endorsement from Donald Trump, Vance was elected to the U.S. Senate in 2022. In the Senate, Vance serves on the Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs Committee; the Commerce, Science, and Transportation Committee; the Joint Economic Committee; and the Special Committee on Aging.

    Where J.D. Vance Stands on the Issues:

    Immigration:

    In one of his first Senate campaign advertisements, Vance released a video blaming Joe Biden for the border crisis and its effects on Ohio communities. He said, “Joe Biden’s open border is killing Ohioans. With more illegal drugs and more Democrat voters pouring into this country.” Vance supports finishing the border wall, opposes amnesty for illegal immigrants, and advocates for a merit-based system for legal immigration. He has also expressed concerns about immigrants being a source of cheap labor, suggesting, “If you cannot hire illegal migrants to staff your hotels, then you have to go to one of the seven million prime-age American men who are out of the labor force and find some way to re-engage them.”

    Abortion:

    Initially favoring a 15-week ban, Vance has recently supported leaving the decision to the states. In a “Face the Nation”, he stated, “I am pro-life. I want to save as many babies as possible. And sure, I think it’s totally reasonable to say that late-term abortions should not happen with reasonable exceptions. But I think Trump’s approach here is trying to settle a very tough issue and actually empower the American people to decide it for themselves.”

    Ukraine:

    Vance has long opposed funding for the war in Ukraine. In an op-ed for the New York Times, he argued, “Ukraine needs more soldiers than it can field, even with draconian conscription policies. And it needs more matériel than the United States can provide. This reality must inform any future Ukraine policy, from further congressional aid to the diplomatic course set by the president.” He accused President Biden of failing “to articulate even basic facts about what Ukraine needs and how this aid will change the reality on the ground.”

    Middle East:

    Vance has staunchly supported Israel throughout its war in Gaza, defending their wartime policies. 

    He led the effort to consider and vote on aid to Ukraine and Israel in separate packages. In a memo circulated among Republicans, he stated, “Israel has a clear plan, and we have a clear means of helping them to fulfill that plan — by providing very specific munitions to enable Israel to conduct a limited operation with a view to neutralizing the threat Hamas poses to Israel. We have no such plan for the Russia-Ukraine War.”

    2020 Election:

    Vance believes the 2020 election was stolen from Trump and has suggested there were significant problems that require political solutions. He stated in an interview with George Stephanopoulos, “If I had been vice president, I would have told the states, like Pennsylvania, Georgia, and so many others, that we needed to have multiple slates of electors and I think the U.S. Congress should have fought over it from there. That is the legitimate way to deal with an election that a lot of folks, including me, think had a lot of problems in 2020.” He has dismissed Trump’s role in the January 6 events, saying on CNN, “Look, Jan. 6 was a bad day. It was a riot. But the idea that Donald Trump endangered anyone’s lives when he told them to protest peacefully, it’s just absurd.”

    Economy:

    In his “Face the Nation” interview, Vance called for broad-based tariffs on imports, particularly from China, to protect American industries from unfair competition, which he attributes to slave labor rather than superior workers. He said, “…we need to apply some broad-based tariffs, especially on goods coming in from China and not just solar panels and EV stuff. We need to protect American industries from all of the competition. Because here- here’s the thing, Margaret, the reason China beats us, it’s not because they have better workers, it’s because they’re willing to use slaves–”

    Environment:

    While acknowledging climate change, Vance doubts its anthropogenic causes. He supports drilling for oil in the U.S. and criticizes the Biden administration for subsidizing alternative energy sources and demonizing reliable power sources. In a speech to the American Leadership Forum in 2022, he stated, “I’m skeptical of the idea that climate change is caused purely by man. It’s been changing, as others pointed out, it’s been changing for millennia…”

    ____________________________________________________________________________

    Although Vance was not always a Trump supporter, his perspective has evolved. Initially “Never Trumper,” Vance criticized Trump harshly in 2016 calling him a “terrible candidate” and even saying he was “America’s Hitler.” However, he has since reversed his stance, praising Trump’s presidency and working diligently to secure his second term.

    Former President Trump praised Vance in his announcement on TruthSocial, highlighting Vance’s military service, academic achievements, bestselling memoir, and business career. Trump emphasized Vance’s commitment to American workers and farmers and his dedication to upholding the Constitution and supporting the troops.

    He wrote “After lengthy deliberation and thought and considering the tremendous talents of many others, I have decided that the person best suited to assume the position of Vice President of the United States is Senator J.D. Vance of the great state of Ohio. J.D. honorably served our country in the Marine Corps, graduated from Ohio State University in two years, Summa Cum Laude, and is a Yale Law School graduate, where he was the editor of the Yale Law Journal and President of the Yale Law Veteran Association. J.D.’s book “Hillbilly Elegy” became a Major Best Seller and Movie as it championed the hard-working men and women of our country. J.D. has had a very successful business career in technology and finance, and now, during the campaign will be strongly focused on the people he fought so brilliantly for, the American workers and farmers in Pennsylvania, Michigan, Wisconsin, Ohio, Minnesota, and far beyond. As Vice President J.D. will continue to fight for our Constitution, stand with our troops and we’ll do everything he can to help me MAKE AMERICA GREAT AGAIN. Congratulations to Senator J.D. Vance, his wife, Usha who also graduated from Yale Law School and their three beautiful children. MAGA2024!”

    As we approach the 2024 election, the choice of J.D. Vance as Trump’s running mate adds another layer of complexity to an already dynamic race. Vance’s background and clear positions on critical issues like immigration, abortion, Ukraine, and the economy will significantly influence the political landscape. As election season heats up, it’s essential to stay informed on all matters. Seek out the facts and form your own opinions. This platform aims to provide clear, unbiased information, empowering you to draw your own conclusions. Stay engaged, stay critical, and stay informed.

    Questions to Consider After Reading:

    Do you think J.D. Vance was a good choice for Trump’s VP?

    Should Trump have chosen someone else? Why?

    Is J.D. Vance the strongest candidate to help Donald Trump beat Joe Biden?

  • A Guide to the Republican National Convention: Day 1

    A Guide to the Republican National Convention: Day 1

    In the wake of the assassination attempt on presidential candidate Donald Trump this past Saturday, the Republican National Convention is underway. Taking place in Milwaukee, Wisconsin, the main event on the agenda for the convention’s first day is officially nominating Donald Trump as the Republican presidential candidate. 

    Monday afternoon, Trump was nominated in a roll call vote in which delegates from each state were pledged to Trump. His son, Donald Trump, Jr. announced Florida’s 125 delegates for Trump, pushing Trump past the 1,215 delegate threshold to officially gain the GOP presidential nomination. 

    During the roll call vote, Trump announced on the social media platform, Truth Social, that he had selected Senator JD Vance as his running mate. Vance is a first-term senator from Ohio. He has previously served in the Marine Corps and is best known for writing his best-selling memoir, Hillbilly Elegy, which describes his experience growing up in rural poverty and being raised on Appalachian values. He once was a strong critic of Trump. In 2016, he stated he was a “never Trump guy” and referred to Trump as “America’s Hitler.” But he has since changed his stance, becoming a supporter of Trump after gaining Trump’s endorsement in 2021 for the Ohio senate seat. JD Vance appeared on the convention floor a couple of hours after the vice presidential announcement, greeting supporters and taking photos before being officially nominated as the Republican vice presidential candidate. 

    Key Speakers:

    Marjorie Taylor Green, Representative from Georgia

    Green began her speech by condemning the assassination attempt on Trump and offering prayers and support to Corey Comperatore, who lost his life during the assassination attempt at the rally in Pennsylvania. She then moved to reiterate her stance on immigration, criticizing “open borders” and blaming “illegal aliens” for a poor economy and loss of American jobs. She also criticized the aid to Ukraine, claiming that American’s tax dollars would be better used funding a border wall before ending her speech by reiterating her support for Trump, stating “Trump is the president America deserves.”

    Wesley Hunt, Representative from Texas

    Hunt criticized the economy and rising inflation rates under Biden. He claimed that under Trump. families had “more money in their pockets” and were living through the “greatest economy” before ending his speech with the message: “Trump will make America great again.”

    John James, Representative from Michigan

    “If you don’t vote for Trump, you aren’t black.” James began his speech praising his time at West Point and service in the army, calling his life story the “American Dream” story before attacking Joe Biden and the Democrats, stating that they have “given up on the American Dream” and instead intend to use American tax dollars to fund “their woke agenda and the Green New Deal.” He then praised Trump for securing the borders and fostering a strong economy, claiming that under Trump families will be able to go from poverty to riches in “one generation.”

    Katie Britt, Senator from Alabama

    Britt attributed the rising price of groceries, gas, electricity, mortgage rates, and rent to the failings of the Biden administration. She stated that Trump will instead deliver “strong borders” and “strong families and communities.” Her speech reiterated the republican message of American exceptionalism and promised Trump would bring “limitless opportunities” by fixing the current state of the economy.

    Tim Scott, Senator from South Carolina

    Scott criticized Biden’s ability to perform his presidential duties, claiming Biden is “asleep at the wheel” and that “America deserves better.” He then stated, “America is not a racist country,” praising conservative values for fostering unity while claiming democratic cities incite racial poverty. He stated that tax cuts granted by Trump will provide opportunities for growth and praised Trump’s ability and commitment to securing the border. The crowd then broke out in a chant for “four more years” after Scott declared that the Republican party was the party of “Fredrick Douglas, Abraham Lincoln, Ronald Regan, and Donald Trump.”

    Glenn Youngkin, Governor of Virginia

    “Joe must go!” Youngkin addressed the increases in mortgage rates, gas and grocery prices, and inflation which he claimed the Biden/Harris campaign was responsible for. He praised Trump’s position as an “outside businessman” and commended Trump’s tax cuts, “slashing of red tape,” and credited Trump with creating new jobs within Virginia. He reiterated the Trump campaign’s message of “high growth and low taxes” will “lift up all Americans.”

    Kristi Noem, Governor of South Dakota

    Noem first compared the Trump presidency to the Biden presidency, stating that Trump allowed her to “do her job” under COVID. She praised Trump for allowing her to run her state without federal oversight in comparison to Biden. Noem portrayed Trump as a fighter, calling the impeachments, current charges against him, and the assassination attempt as mere obstacles Trump has fought to overcome. She then cites Lincoln’s Gettysburg address, calling for a unity of people amongst great division as she urged her fellow Republicans to win the “hearts and minds” of the people.

    Byron Donalds, Representative of Florida

    Donalds first targeted public school education systems, stating that parents should be able to choose what was being taught in their child’s schools and that under Trump “all America’s children” will get the chance to choose which schools they wish to go to. He then claimed that the Biden/Haris administration enabled rising inflation rates under Biden’s “American Rescue Plan,” ignoring Donalds’ warning about the plan. He then urged that the people must come together under Trump in order for the economy to “boom again” and to “make America wealthy again.”

    Charlie Kirk, Turning Point Action Founder

    “The American Dream has become a luxury item for the wealthy and elite.” Speaking to the Millennials and Generation Z, Kirk blames Biden for the younger generations’ inability to “purchase a house” or “start a family.” He claims that under Trump’s economic platform, the American dream will become within reach again.

    Marsha Blackburn, Senator of Tennessee

    Blackburn claims that when Biden first entered office, “gas was $2.49 a gallon” and today “gas is $3.54,” arguing that “Bidenomics” has caused the rising gas prices and will only continue to raise taxes. In opposition, she claims Trump created “the largest tax cuts in history” and when reelected will make those tax cuts “permanent.” She also claimed that Biden and Harris hired “85,000 IRS agents” to “harass” small businesses, but Trump will fire those workers. She vows that Trump will return the country to “economic greatness.” 

    Amber Rose, Model and TV Personality

    “The best chance we have to give our babies a chance at a better life is to elect Donald Trump.” She once was a Democrat but after meeting with Trump and his base, she switched her support for Donald Trump, claiming that “it’s all love” and “these are [her] people” after feeling lied to by the media. She also cited rising gas and grocery prices as her main causes of concern. 

    After Senator Blackburn’s appearance, Trump made an appearance wearing a bandage over his ear, entering the convention to the cheers of the crowd. The crowd then began chanting “We want Trump” throughout the rest of the convention’s night.

    Finally ending on the crowd’s chants of “We want Trump,” the convention was adjourned until 5 pm central time on Tuesday. 

    Day 1 of the RNC began with the nomination of Donald J. Trump and JD Vance and the Presidential and Vice Presidential candidates for the GOP. After the nominations were official, the convention adjourned until later that evening. Night 1 of the RNC saw a selection of Republican congresspeople and voters who spoke in support of Trump and his reelection campaign. The main points the speakers hit were criticizing the current state of the economy, rising inflation rates, and border and job security. The general consensus was that a second term of Trump would boost the economy, provide massive tax cuts, and protect Americans from illegal immigrants and the far-left agenda. Then, towards the end of the first conference day, Trump entered the convention hall and sat with his running mate until the meeting was adjourned. Trump is expected to give a speech Thursday, the last day of the RNC.

  • Jill Stein

    Jill Stein

    Party

    Green Party

    Home State

    Massachusetts

    Experience

    Doctor, Co-Founder of Massachusetts Coalition for Healthy Communities, Environmental activist

    Donors

    Stein’s campaign is mostly funded through small individual contributions, with the top contributor being FEC Penalty.

    Stein

    Top 3 Issues

    A Just Economy

    Stein believes we need an Economic Bill of Rights in order to reverse economic inequality and insecurity. This would guarantee essentials like a living-wage job, housing, food, healthcare, and education to all citizens. Additionally, she advocates for an inclusive economy that serves everyone, not just the wealthy and powerful.

    Climate Change

    Stein promises to address climate change and advocates for immediate action to stop global warming. She supports a Green New Deal, which is aimed to transition America from crisis to a secure and sustainable future. Stein’s program would feature massive investment in green jobs, industries, and technologies to revitalize the American economy, improve our quality of life, protect our planet and safeguard our children’s future.

    Freedom and Equality

    Stein intends to put an end to systemic discrimination against marginalized groups, including women, POC, Indigenous people, immigrants, people with disabilities, and the LGBTQIA+ community. She is in favor of abortion rights, marriage equality, and supports a wider pathway to citizenship for immigrants.

  • Donald Trump

    Republican

    Donald Trump

    Party

    Republican

    Home State

    New York/Florida

    Experience

    45th President of the United States. Prior to taking office Donald Trump was known for his business dealings and reality TV appearances.

    Donors

    The Trump campaign is primarily financed through large campaign contributions from corporations, most notably the finance, real estate, and insurance industry.

     

    Donald Trump

    Top 3 Issues

    Economy

    Donald Trump touts an “unprecedented economic boom” while he was in office and promises to continue the economic policy of his presidency “lower taxes, bigger paychecks, and more jobs for the American worker.” Some of the achievements that he cites include 7 million jobs created, an increase in middle-class family income, the lowest unemployment rate in 50 years, and increased optimism among small business owners.

      Renegotiate trade agreements

    Donald Trump promises a plan to bring manufacturing back to the United States to end the reliance on China for national security and medical goods. Donald Trump also proposes banning the owning of critical United States infrastructure by the Chinese. Donald Trump would like to increase tariffs on imports from many foreign nations while decreasing imports from China all together in hopes of increasing American jobs.

     Energy Independence

    Donald Trump envisions a United States that is energy independent. Through increased oil, natural gas and clean coal productions consumers and businesses would pay lower energy costs. Trump would provide tax breaks for the producers of oil, natural gas, and clean coal to incentivize the increased production.

  • Kamala Harris

    Kamala Harris

    Party

    Democrat

    Home State

    California

    Experience

    US Senator for California, 32nd District Attorney of California, and Current 49th Vice President.

    Donors

    Harris’s campaign is mostly funded through large contributions, with the top contributors being Future Forward USA Action, a left-leaning organization whose mission is to rebuild America’s middle class and American democracy, and the Lincoln Project, which is a political action committee founded by moderate or former Republicans who oppose Donald Trump.

    Top 3 Issues

    Harris supports legislation to protect access to abortion nationally. She opposes a national abortion ban and has taken steps to urge Congress to restore the reproductive protections originally granted in Roe v. Wade. During her time as Senator before the overturning of Roe vs. Wade, she cosponsored legislation that would limit a state’s ability to limit or burden abortion access. Under the Biden campaign, she has fought for reproductive freedom by protecting FDA-approved medication abortion, supporting those who must travel to seek reproductive health care, and protecting the privacy of patients and healthcare providers

    Harris has largely backed Biden’s infrastructure plan such as his $1.9 trillion American Rescue Plan, aimed at revitalizing the economy post-pandemic, alongside investments in significant infrastructure upgrades and climate actions, and his Inflation Reduction Act, which provides funding for small businesses and caped the cost of insulin. For her own agenda, she supports the Economic Opportunity Coalition, which aims to partner the public and private sectors together, resulting in the investment of billions of dollars to create opportunity and grow the wealth of underserved communities. The goal of these investments is to expand access to health care and cut insulin prices, boost educational investments, make housing more affordable, and increase the wealth of American families.

    As vice president, Harris has prioritized dealing with the root causes of immigration, specifically from Latin American countries. Last year, she announced that $950 million in pledges from private companies would support Latin American countries to mitigate poverty and violence by supporting farmers and creating textile jobs. As senator, she co-sponsored the Dreamer Confidentiality Act, which prevented the Department of Homeland Security from disclosing information about DACA (Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals, or more commonly called Dreamers) recipients to the Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE). In 2020, she also co-sponsored the Coronavirus Immigrant Families Protection Act, which would “address immigration issues related to COVID-19” by establishing programs that would translate materials and provide telephone hotlines in the specified needed language.

  • Nicole Shanahan

    Nicole Shanahan– Vice Presidential Candidate

    Party

    Independent

    Home State

    Experience

    No prior political experience. An attorney and entrepreneur, she is the founder and president of Bia-Echo Foundation, which focuses on reproductive longevity and equality, criminal justice reform, and environmental sustainability. She is also the co-founder of ClearAccessIP, an AI patent analytics company.

    Donors

    Nicole Shanahan has been a significant donor to Robert F. Kennedy Jr. campaign. In 2023, she donated $6,600 to Mr. Kennedy, the maximum allowed for an individual contributor, when he was running as a Democrat for the presidential nomination. Additionally, she donated $4 million to a pro-Kennedy super PAC and has stated that she contributed another $8 million to the campaign.

     

    Top 3 Issues

    Health

    Nicole supports abortion rights with certain limits, as she stated here: “As a mom, and a person with a womb, I don’t like the feeling of anyone having control over my body. It is coercive. It is wrong. But, I am also a woman that would not feel right terminating a viable life living inside of me, especially if I am both healthy and that baby is healthy.” She believes an appropriate limit would be within “15-18 weeks.” Nicole supports state rights in determining abortion laws, stating, “communities know the answer to this question.” Nicole criticizes IVF and advocates for alternative and natural approaches to reproductive longevity. In support of this, her company, Bia-Echo, launched the world’s first Reproductive Longevity and Equality initiative at the Buck Institute.

    Environment

    Nicole is dedicated to promoting a “healthy and livable” planet. Through Bia-Echo, she advocates for innovative solutions to address environmental challenges and ensure the planet’s sustainability for future generations.

    People

    Nicole also advocates for criminal justice reform to create a more equitable society. Through the Smart Prosecution Project, she seeks to apply data science to the prosecutorial process and has been actively involved in research on artificial intelligence and its impact on government and law. Nicole was a major donor to Measure J, which is an initiative which dedicates “unrestricted funding to address the disproportionate impact of racial injustice through community investments such as youth development, job training, small business development, supportive housing services and alternatives to incarceration.”

  • Understanding the Electoral College Debate

    Understanding the Electoral College Debate

    Background

    During American presidential elections, news coverage focuses on the “270 to win” count rather than the actual majority of individual votes that candidates receive. This is due to the fact that presidential elections are decided by a system called the Electoral College, in which a candidate needs 270 electoral votes to win the presidency. The Electoral College is outlined in Article 2, Section 1 of the Constitution. It was devised by the Framers in 1787 as a compromise between competing visions for electing the president—rather than a direct popular vote, electors from each state would meet to choose the president. These electors are selected anew for each election and represent their respective states or the District of Columbia.

    In the late 18th century, the United States consisted of 13 states. Delegates at the Constitutional Convention struggled with how to balance the power of larger states with that of smaller ones. They sought a system that would prevent domination by states with larger populations. Thus, the Electoral College’s apportionment is based on the total state population, not the number of eligible voters. This approach also granted white voters in the South greater influence because enslaved people counted as a part of the total state population despite the fact that they could not vote. Initially, the College was envisioned as independent, empowered to choose winners based on merit. Few delegates had faith in citizens’ ability to make the ‘right’ selections directly but believed they could competently choose electors capable of making informed decisions.

    The Electoral College differs significantly from a direct popular vote for three reasons. The most drastic difference is in the form of the “Plus Two” effect. Each state is allocated electors based on the number of Representatives sent to the House of Representatives, plus the number of Senators sent to the Senate. Every state has two Senators, and Representatives vary by state population The impact of these additional votes varies greatly between populous states like California (53 Representatives) and smaller states like Wyoming (1 Representative). Secondly, all states and the District of Columbia (except for Maine and Nebraska) follow a winner-takes-all approach, in which the candidate who wins the majority of votes in a state receives all its electoral votes no matter how small said majority is. Lastly, U.S. territories are not eligible to send electors to the Electoral College.

    The question central to this debate today is whether or not the Electoral College is outdated or still necessary. Public opinion is not in favor of the College: in September 2023, 65% of U.S. adults favored its abolishment. This may be because five presidents won the Electoral College and lost the popular vote, including two in the past 25 years. Two reforms attempt to mitigate issues with the winner-takes-all effect and the somewhat frequent discrepancy between the popular vote and the electoral vote. The first is the district system, which allocates electoral votes based on congressional districts, potentially reducing the winner-takes-all impact. The second is the National Popular Vote Compact (NPVC), where states commit to awarding their electors to the national popular vote winner. However, this compact has only been adopted by 16 states and D.C.

    Arguments in Favor of the Electoral College

    The Electoral College ensures that all parts of the country are represented in presidential elections, especially rural areas that might otherwise be overshadowed by cities. In addition, the Electoral College safeguards against the tyranny of the majority—supporters believe the Electoral College provides a clear, secure process, reducing potential questions about a national vote count and its accuracy and encourages broad-based coalitions to promote more moderate political parties due to the need of presidential candidates to capture swing states. 

    Supporters point to the fact that the Electoral College was the reason for the election of Abraham Lincoln in 1860, even though he won less than 50% of the popular vote. Supporters also counter the idea that the Electoral College is outdated by citing past reforms that arguably made the system more responsive to the popular vote. In particular, the 12th Amendment instituted a joint ticket system for the election of the vice president and the president together (in place of the second-place presidential finisher becoming the vice president). In addition, state legislatures used to choose the electors but, by the end of the 1800s all states moved to allow voters choose the electors. These reforms are cited as evidence that the Electoral College can be altered to evolve with the times while still remaining an important institution. In addition, some proponents say that because replacing the Electoral College with a different system would require a Constitutional amendment, it is too lofty of a goal, and that we should instead work on improving it when needed.

    Arguments Against the Electoral College

    A common argument against the Electoral College is that its design reflects compromises between slaveholding states and non-slaveholding states, tainting the legitimacy of the system. Today, there is evidence that Black people in the South hold less voting power in the winner-take-all system because they are overpowered by white voters in their states. Critics also argue that the winner-take-all system  makes elections unfairly rely on swing states and unequally spread votes. Furthermore, electors are not constitutionally obligated to vote for the person who won their state, although “faithless electors” are incredibly rare. Some also say that due to how nationalized politics have become in the 21st century, factoring state perspectives into the national political system is less important than it once was and thus no longer a valid argument for the Electoral College’s existence. One final argument by opponents of the College is that proposed reforms (such as the district system) will not solve the problem of how smaller states benefit from the “plus two” effect in the apportionment of votes.

    Recent DevelopmentsThe 2022 Electoral Count Reform and Presidential Transition Improvement Act, signed into law the year after the January 6th, 2021 attack, states that the Vice President’s role during Congress’s Electoral vote count will be primarily administrative rather than political. In addition, objections to the count by members of Congress must now be supported by at least one-fifth of both the House and Senate’s members. This act, intended to safeguard Congressional authority over the procedures of the Electoral College, will soon be put to the test. During the 2024 election cycle and those in the future, the American public and politicians must decide whether the Electoral College is needed to provide balance to the presidential election system and give smaller states a voice, or if it is an outdated element of the Constitution that reflects a different time in U.S. history.

  • Pros and Cons of TX SB1933

    Pros and Cons of TX SB1933

    Introduction

    Since 2022, legislatures nationwide have been passing legislation to secure election processes. In 2023, eleven states passed voting laws that make voting more restrictive to ensure the integrity of the election process. One of these laws is Texas’s Senate Bill 1933. The 2023 bill allows the Secretary of State to control an election within counties with a population of over four million contingent on someone filing a complaint against the election processes. However, Harris County is the only county in Texas with a population of over 4 million. Thus, it is the only county that qualifies under this bill. Although Harris County had notable issues in the 2022 election cycle, which caused it to be singled out, there are arguments that the legislation is politically targeted.  

    Arguments in Favor

    In an audit conducted by Texas’s Secretary of State, Harris County was found to have issues with ballot distributions, equipment issues, incomplete paperwork, and insufficient training, among other problems. With over ten thousand election irregularities in the primary and general elections 2022, the legislature saw cause for concern. By creating a process for intervention, proponents of the bill claim that the election process will be more secure, restoring voter confidence in the election process. Proponents also point out that there are requirements for the Secretary of State to be able to take control of the election. There must be a “good cause” with a pattern of issues in the election process. In the event of malfunctioning equipment, uncounted votes, or voting registration issues, the Secretary of State will notify the county election authority to conduct an intervention. If this intervention proceeds, the Secretary of State will eventually take charge of the election process. 

    Additionally, the law should deter partisan advantages. Some people think the election rules in 2020, like accommodations for mail-in ballots, were changed to benefit Democrats rather than to protect against the spread of COVID-19. In case of a claim like this, the SB 1933 will allow the Secretary of State of Texas to investigate and prevent such an occurrence. Much opposition to SB 1933 comes from the fact that, when put into practice, it could increase barriers to voting, such as ID restrictions and the prevention of mail-in voting. However, in analyzing election legislation across states that impose barriers to voting, Politico summarized that restrictions and expansions of voting laws do not create exaggerated impacts; instead, the turnout for voting, both Republican and Democrat, remains largely the same, eliminating any partisan advantage. This finding maintains that SB 1933’s impact would not lower voter turnout to the extent that the opposition claims. 

    Arguments Against

    Arguments against SB 1933 lie in the demographics of Harris County. 44.6% of Harris County is Hispanic, and 20.6% is African American, making it one of the most diverse counties in the state. Furthermore, Harris County is one of the largest democratic strongholds in Texas. Because the bill was passed by a Republican majority legislature, in conjecture, these demographic trends raise questions about the partisan bias in the bill. In the event of a takeover by the Secretary of State – a Republican – could make it harder for voting to take place, preventing largely Democratic votes from being counted. Opponents of the bill believe that if the Secretary of State could take over the election process, they would take subsequent steps to suppress democratic voters – who in Harris County are citizens in minority groups.

    Moreover, because the threshold for intervention in the “good cause” claim is vague, opponents argue it can be easily abused. If the Secretary of State finds a reason to take over the election, the oversight can last up to two years until the problems are resolved. If election control is maintained by the state, especially for long periods of time, there is a question of whether the election process would remain nonpartisan. Since someone from the Republican party generally holds the Secretary of State position, their oversight of elections in a largely Democratic county means they could change policy to make it less favorable to a specific demographic of voters. This possible policy change could manifest with restrictions on early voting, mail-in ballots, and absentee voting – all impacting democratic voter turnout.

    Future Developments

    Laws aimed at securing the election process, such as SB 1933, are going through various state legislatures. However, in analyzing these policies, answering whether the laws truly secure the election process or if they disenfranchise a group of voters is essential. SB 1933 has much debate on both sides; however, one thing is known: the next election in Harris County will be markedly different than the prior ones.